HbA1c Stratification Identifies High-Risk ICU Patients: Mortality and Complications in a Retrospective Critical Care Cohort

Introduction Glycemic variability is common in critical illness and can obscure the prognostic significance of premorbid glycemic status. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reflects chronic glycemia and may improve risk stratification beyond acute glucose measurements. We examined whether HbA1c-defined glycemic phenotypes were associated with in-hospital complications and mortality among critically ill adults. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV (v3.1), a de-identified database of ICU admissions at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2008-2019). Adults (≥18 years) with a documented HbA1c during the index hospitalization and first ICU admission were included ( N = 13,552). Patients were classified into eight mutually exclusive groups based on diabetes diagnosis status and HbA1c: healthy (≤5.7% without diabetes), undiagnosed prediabetes (5.8%–6.4%), undiagnosed diabetes (≥6.5%), and five diagnosed-diabetes strata (<6.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, ≥9.0%). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex compared each group with healthy controls for composite complications and in-hospital mortality. Results HbA1c was available in 20.7% of first ICU admissions; 40.7% of included patients had diagnosed diabetes and 2.6% had undiagnosed diabetes. Compared with healthy controls, odds of any complication were higher in undiagnosed prediabetes (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48; p < .001) and several diagnosed-diabetes strata (OR range 1.31-1.90; all p ≤ .006). Renal complications showed the most consistent elevation across dysglycemic groups, including very poor glycemic control (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.95-2.53; p < .001). Sepsis-related complications were increased across all diabetes-range groups; undiagnosed diabetes had OR 2.08 (95% CI 1.53-2.83; p < .001). In-hospital mortality was highest in undiagnosed diabetes (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.73-3.14; p < .001). Conclusion Among ICU patients in whom HbA1c was measured, HbA1c-defined dysglycemia, particularly undiagnosed diabetes, was associated with substantially higher ICU morbidity and mortality. Because HbA1c testing was selective and provided limited incremental prognostic value beyond established severity scores, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation before supporting routine HbA1c screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2026-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666261483519
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

HbA1c Stratification Identifies High-Risk ICU Patients: Mortality and Complications in a Retrospective Critical Care Cohort

Isaac Li Huang, Robert Canelli, Paul Karim, Federico Bilotta et al.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

HbA1c Stratification Identifies High-Risk ICU Patients: Mortality and Complications in a Retrospective Critical Care Cohort

Isaac Li Huang, Robert Canelli, Paul Karim, Federico Bilotta, Marco Sanvitti, Jiahui Chen
article en

Abstract

Introduction Glycemic variability is common in critical illness and can obscure the prognostic significance of premorbid glycemic status. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reflects chronic glycemia and may improve risk stratification beyond acute glucose measurements. We examined whether HbA1c-defined glycemic phenotypes were associated with in-hospital complications and mortality among critically ill adults. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV (v3.1), a de-identified database of ICU admissions at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2008-2019). Adults (≥18 years) with a documented HbA1c during the index hospitalization and first ICU admission were included ( N = 13,552). Patients were classified into eight mutually exclusive groups based on diabetes diagnosis status and HbA1c: healthy (≤5.7% without diabetes), undiagnosed prediabetes (5.8%–6.4%), undiagnosed diabetes (≥6.5%), and five diagnosed-diabetes strata (<6.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, ≥9.0%). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex compared each group with healthy controls for composite complications and in-hospital mortality. Results HbA1c was available in 20.7% of first ICU admissions; 40.7% of included patients had diagnosed diabetes and 2.6% had undiagnosed diabetes. Compared with healthy controls, odds of any complication were higher in undiagnosed prediabetes (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48; p < .001) and several diagnosed-diabetes strata (OR range 1.31-1.90; all p ≤ .006). Renal complications showed the most consistent elevation across dysglycemic groups, including very poor glycemic control (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.95-2.53; p < .001). Sepsis-related complications were increased across all diabetes-range groups; undiagnosed diabetes had OR 2.08 (95% CI 1.53-2.83; p < .001). In-hospital mortality was highest in undiagnosed diabetes (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.73-3.14; p < .001). Conclusion Among ICU patients in whom HbA1c was measured, HbA1c-defined dysglycemia, particularly undiagnosed diabetes, was associated with substantially higher ICU morbidity and mortality. Because HbA1c testing was selective and provided limited incremental prognostic value beyond established severity scores, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation before supporting routine HbA1c screening.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston University (US), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Johnson University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.