Cross-Border Procurement in the European Union and Beyond: A Game Theoretic Framework

In recent years the EU has been concerned about third countries reciprocating access, in their own domestic Public Procurement Markets (PPM), to EU firms as much as Europe does to third countries’ companies. Reaching a consensus on how to behave with third countries firms was a difficult and time taking process in EU. This paper aims to contribute to understand the difficulties of reciprocation in opening PPM. Within a stylised game theoretic framework, the main message of the paper suggests that open PPM may be more likely under two main conditions. When in the countries’ negotiations the perspective of contracting authorities prevails or, when the business firms’ perspective prevails, however as long as negotiators can reliably estimate and explicitly take into account the companies’ costs for executing contracts. Because of the model assumptions and limitations, the above findings can only be interpreted as examples rather than general conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261476296
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Border Procurement in the European Union and Beyond: A Game Theoretic Framework

Nicola Dimitri
Public Finance Review
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Cross-Border Procurement in the European Union and Beyond: A Game Theoretic Framework

Nicola Dimitri
article en

Abstract

In recent years the EU has been concerned about third countries reciprocating access, in their own domestic Public Procurement Markets (PPM), to EU firms as much as Europe does to third countries’ companies. Reaching a consensus on how to behave with third countries firms was a difficult and time taking process in EU. This paper aims to contribute to understand the difficulties of reciprocation in opening PPM. Within a stylised game theoretic framework, the main message of the paper suggests that open PPM may be more likely under two main conditions. When in the countries’ negotiations the perspective of contracting authorities prevails or, when the business firms’ perspective prevails, however as long as negotiators can reliably estimate and explicitly take into account the companies’ costs for executing contracts. Because of the model assumptions and limitations, the above findings can only be interpreted as examples rather than general conclusions.

Public Finance Review
University of Siena (IT)
European Parliament
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.