The Effect of Different Types of Surface Treatment on the Strength of the Bond Between Veneering Ceramic and Titanium

Prosthetic restorations made of titanium and its alloys are often veneered with ceramics. While Co-Cr or Ni-Cr alloys are subjected to high-temperature oxidation before ceramic application, this is not possible for titanium due to its high reactivity; hence, the resulting layers are thick, porous, and have poor adhesion. An alternative method for obtaining an oxide layer is anodic oxidation, or anodization. This paper presents the shear strength of the titanium–ceramic bond after different anodization variants. The following reagents were used for oxidation: Group A—1 molar phosphoric acid (V), Group B—1 molar sulfuric acid (VI), Group C—1 molar mixture of the above acids, and Group D—2% Na2SiO3 at pH = 13.1. The veneering ceramic was applied to the treated sample surfaces, and the samples were subjected to a shear test. Anodic oxidation was found to increase the joint stress compared to a control group of unanodized samples (Group 0). The highest strength was achieved for samples from groups A and B. Hence, anodic oxidation improved the titanium–ceramic adhesion of polished samples compared to the control group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ceramics
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9090095
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Effect of Different Types of Surface Treatment on the Strength of the Bond Between Veneering Ceramic and Titanium

L. Klimek, Beata Śmielak, Michał Wilk
Ceramics
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

The Effect of Different Types of Surface Treatment on the Strength of the Bond Between Veneering Ceramic and Titanium

L. Klimek, Beata Śmielak, Michał Wilk
article en

Abstract

Prosthetic restorations made of titanium and its alloys are often veneered with ceramics. While Co-Cr or Ni-Cr alloys are subjected to high-temperature oxidation before ceramic application, this is not possible for titanium due to its high reactivity; hence, the resulting layers are thick, porous, and have poor adhesion. An alternative method for obtaining an oxide layer is anodic oxidation, or anodization. This paper presents the shear strength of the titanium–ceramic bond after different anodization variants. The following reagents were used for oxidation: Group A—1 molar phosphoric acid (V), Group B—1 molar sulfuric acid (VI), Group C—1 molar mixture of the above acids, and Group D—2% Na2SiO3 at pH = 13.1. The veneering ceramic was applied to the treated sample surfaces, and the samples were subjected to a shear test. Anodic oxidation was found to increase the joint stress compared to a control group of unanodized samples (Group 0). The highest strength was achieved for samples from groups A and B. Hence, anodic oxidation improved the titanium–ceramic adhesion of polished samples compared to the control group.

CeramicsVol. 9(9)
Lodz University of Technology (PL), Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of Different Types of Surface Treatment on the Strength of the Bond Between Veneering Ceramic and Titanium — L. Klimek, Beata Śmielak, et al. · Ceramics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS