Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder‐15 ( ED ‐15): Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Eating Disorder Caseness in Treatment Seekers

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the factor structure, measurement invariance, and discriminative ability of the Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) questionnaire in a large transdiagnostic clinical population of treatment-seeking adults. METHOD: = 30.73 years; 77.0% women; 71.1% in Australia) seeking mental health treatment across different settings of routine clinical practice. After initial completion of the ED-15, subsamples completed additional measures within ±365 days of the initial ED-15 and/or repeated the ED-15 at least 7 days later. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported both the hypothesized two-factor and a bi-factor model (with a general factor), with the two-factor model retained as the preferred structure, consistent with theory and prior research. The ED-15 also demonstrated strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In subsamples, there was preliminary evidence of measurement invariance across gender, time, country, and to a lesser extent age group. Correlations supported good concurrent validity with eating disorder pathology and eating-related impairment, while convergent validity was mixed, with moderate associations with psychological distress and maladaptive perfectionism, but weak or negligible associations with personal standards perfectionism and autism-related traits. Receiver operating characteristic analyses deriving an optimal diagnostic cut-off indicated good discriminative validity, with the ED-15 discriminating probable eating disorder caseness. DISCUSSION: Findings add to the growing evidence on the ED-15's latent structure and provide preliminary support for measurement invariance, supporting its use as a brief, psychometrically sound tool in routine clinical practice. Future research should evaluate its intended use for session-by-session monitoring of eating disorder symptom change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70202
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder‐15 ( ED ‐15): Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Eating Disorder Caseness in Treatment Seekers

Tracey Wade, Jamie‐Lee Pennesi, Yuan Zhou, David Hegarty et al.
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder‐15 ( ED ‐15): Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Eating Disorder Caseness in Treatment Seekers

Tracey Wade, Jamie‐Lee Pennesi, Yuan Zhou, David Hegarty, Laura C. Edney, Brynn Buchanan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the factor structure, measurement invariance, and discriminative ability of the Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) questionnaire in a large transdiagnostic clinical population of treatment-seeking adults. METHOD: = 30.73 years; 77.0% women; 71.1% in Australia) seeking mental health treatment across different settings of routine clinical practice. After initial completion of the ED-15, subsamples completed additional measures within ±365 days of the initial ED-15 and/or repeated the ED-15 at least 7 days later. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported both the hypothesized two-factor and a bi-factor model (with a general factor), with the two-factor model retained as the preferred structure, consistent with theory and prior research. The ED-15 also demonstrated strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In subsamples, there was preliminary evidence of measurement invariance across gender, time, country, and to a lesser extent age group. Correlations supported good concurrent validity with eating disorder pathology and eating-related impairment, while convergent validity was mixed, with moderate associations with psychological distress and maladaptive perfectionism, but weak or negligible associations with personal standards perfectionism and autism-related traits. Receiver operating characteristic analyses deriving an optimal diagnostic cut-off indicated good discriminative validity, with the ED-15 discriminating probable eating disorder caseness. DISCUSSION: Findings add to the growing evidence on the ED-15's latent structure and provide preliminary support for measurement invariance, supporting its use as a brief, psychometrically sound tool in routine clinical practice. Future research should evaluate its intended use for session-by-session monitoring of eating disorder symptom change.

International Journal of Eating Disorders
Flinders University (AU), Novita Healthcare (Australia) (AU), Monash University (AU), Southern Cross University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.