Defining Reference Intervals of Emerging Extended Inflammatory Parameters ( EIP ) in a Population‐Based Study

ABSTRACT Introduction Extended inflammatory parameters (EIPs), including neutrophil reactivity intensity (NEUT‐RI), neutrophil granularity intensity (NEUT‐GI), reactive lymphocytes (RE‐LYMP), and antibody‐synthesizing lymphocytes (AS‐LYMP), provide a rapid assessment of leukocyte activation. These parameters show diagnostic and prognostic value in infections and inflammatory diseases. However, their clinical application remains limited by the lack of standardized reference intervals (RIs), particularly in Southeast Asian populations. This study established population‐based RIs for EIPs in healthy Thai adults. Methods Reference intervals were established following CLSI EP28 ‐A3c guidelines. Healthy adults were included if they had no history of chronic disease, recent infection or inflammation, pregnancy, or medication use affecting white blood cells, and demonstrated normal CBC results without qualitative flags. Outliers were excluded using the Tukey method. Non‐parametric methods were applied to calculate RIs , and the Harris and Boyd method was used to evaluate the need for age‐ and sex‐specific partitioning. Results Most EIPs did not require demographic partitioning. Reference intervals of NEUT‐GI ranged from 146.7 to 160.0 scatter intensity (SI) units, and NEUT‐RI ranged from 42.4 to 52.2 fluorescence intensity (FI) units. AS‐LYMP% ranged from 0.0% to 0.4%, while AS‐LYMP# ranged from 0.00 to 0.02 × 10 9 /L. However, RE‐LYMP% and RE‐LYMP# demonstrated significant sex‐related differences requiring sex‐specific RIs. Female RE‐LYMP% ranged from 0.20% to 1.10% and male values from 0.10% to 0.90%, while RE‐LYMP# ranged from 0.01 to 0.08 × 10 9 /L in females and 0.01 to 0.06 × 10 9 /L in males. Conclusion Reference intervals for NEUT ‐ GI , NEUT ‐ RI , RE ‐ LYMP , and AS ‐ LYMP were established in healthy Thai adults. Most EIPs did not require demographic partitioning, whereas RE ‐ LYMP % and RE ‐ LYMP # required sex‐specific intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.70240
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Defining Reference Intervals of Emerging Extended Inflammatory Parameters ( EIP ) in a Population‐Based Study

Karan Paisooksantivatana, Pawadee Chinudomwong, Atisak Jiaranaikulwanich, Mintra Tanakitivirul
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Defining Reference Intervals of Emerging Extended Inflammatory Parameters ( EIP ) in a Population‐Based Study

Karan Paisooksantivatana, Pawadee Chinudomwong, Atisak Jiaranaikulwanich, Mintra Tanakitivirul
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Extended inflammatory parameters (EIPs), including neutrophil reactivity intensity (NEUT‐RI), neutrophil granularity intensity (NEUT‐GI), reactive lymphocytes (RE‐LYMP), and antibody‐synthesizing lymphocytes (AS‐LYMP), provide a rapid assessment of leukocyte activation. These parameters show diagnostic and prognostic value in infections and inflammatory diseases. However, their clinical application remains limited by the lack of standardized reference intervals (RIs), particularly in Southeast Asian populations. This study established population‐based RIs for EIPs in healthy Thai adults. Methods Reference intervals were established following CLSI EP28 ‐A3c guidelines. Healthy adults were included if they had no history of chronic disease, recent infection or inflammation, pregnancy, or medication use affecting white blood cells, and demonstrated normal CBC results without qualitative flags. Outliers were excluded using the Tukey method. Non‐parametric methods were applied to calculate RIs , and the Harris and Boyd method was used to evaluate the need for age‐ and sex‐specific partitioning. Results Most EIPs did not require demographic partitioning. Reference intervals of NEUT‐GI ranged from 146.7 to 160.0 scatter intensity (SI) units, and NEUT‐RI ranged from 42.4 to 52.2 fluorescence intensity (FI) units. AS‐LYMP% ranged from 0.0% to 0.4%, while AS‐LYMP# ranged from 0.00 to 0.02 × 10 9 /L. However, RE‐LYMP% and RE‐LYMP# demonstrated significant sex‐related differences requiring sex‐specific RIs. Female RE‐LYMP% ranged from 0.20% to 1.10% and male values from 0.10% to 0.90%, while RE‐LYMP# ranged from 0.01 to 0.08 × 10 9 /L in females and 0.01 to 0.06 × 10 9 /L in males. Conclusion Reference intervals for NEUT ‐ GI , NEUT ‐ RI , RE ‐ LYMP , and AS ‐ LYMP were established in healthy Thai adults. Most EIPs did not require demographic partitioning, whereas RE ‐ LYMP % and RE ‐ LYMP # required sex‐specific intervals.

International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Ramathibodi Hospital (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.