A success story of hybrid institutional balancing in the Indo-Pacific: a history lesson of the Quad, 2018–2024

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue’s institutional strategies between 2018 and 2024 compelled Beijing to alter its approach to assert regional hegemony that relied on the leveraging of economic interdependencies and low-level warfare supported by its military power. In response to Beijing’s strategy, the Quad produced a counterapproach that relied on inclusive and exclusive agreements comprising neoliberal and neorealist mechanisms to uphold the liberal rules-based order and preserve the territorial status quo in the Indo-Pacific. The Quad agreements laid an inclusive path for mitigating the pressures produced by their economic interdependence on China and the perception of defence asymmetries to produce a counter to the revisionist threat in the region. These Quad strategies signalled the partners’ collective capacity to exclude China from their future growth while also defending its members’ territorial interests, with implications for Beijing’s future growth amid economic stagnation. This research augments Kai He’s explanatory framework for integrated institutional balancing in the context of US–China rivalry, focusing on the implications of economic interdependence and power distribution on balancing decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal Of International Affairs
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2026.2721508
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A success story of hybrid institutional balancing in the Indo-Pacific: a history lesson of the Quad, 2018–2024

Anshu N. Chatterjee
Australian Journal Of International Affairs
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

A success story of hybrid institutional balancing in the Indo-Pacific: a history lesson of the Quad, 2018–2024

Anshu N. Chatterjee
article en

Abstract

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue’s institutional strategies between 2018 and 2024 compelled Beijing to alter its approach to assert regional hegemony that relied on the leveraging of economic interdependencies and low-level warfare supported by its military power. In response to Beijing’s strategy, the Quad produced a counterapproach that relied on inclusive and exclusive agreements comprising neoliberal and neorealist mechanisms to uphold the liberal rules-based order and preserve the territorial status quo in the Indo-Pacific. The Quad agreements laid an inclusive path for mitigating the pressures produced by their economic interdependence on China and the perception of defence asymmetries to produce a counter to the revisionist threat in the region. These Quad strategies signalled the partners’ collective capacity to exclude China from their future growth while also defending its members’ territorial interests, with implications for Beijing’s future growth amid economic stagnation. This research augments Kai He’s explanatory framework for integrated institutional balancing in the context of US–China rivalry, focusing on the implications of economic interdependence and power distribution on balancing decisions.

Australian Journal Of International Affairs
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.