Investigations of lead-free multilayer shielding for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations

The development of sustainable and lead-free shielding materials is of increasing interest for diagnostic radiology facilities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where cost, material availability, and environmental considerations are important factors. This study evaluates the radiation shielding performance of fired clay bricks (FCB), concrete, and stainless steel (SS) as alternative structural materials for X-ray facilities operating up to 150 kVp using Monte Carlo simulations with the PHITS code. Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers were computed to characterize photon attenuation properties and guide the design of multilayer shielding assemblies. Two concrete-encapsulated assemblies were engineered: a standard composite (C8-FCB200-C8, 2.32 mm lead equivalent) and a steel-reinforced composite (SS2-C8-FCB200-C8, 2.73 lead equivalent). Their performance was benchmarked against a conventional 2 mm lead barrier. Photon flux distributions and effective dose rates (EDR) were evaluated at primary (Cell 20) and secondary (Cells 22, 24, 26) shielding boundaries for X-ray tube potentials ranging from 80 to 150 kVp. At 150 kVp, the lead reference barrier reduced the transmitted EDR to 7.09E-09 µSv/h at the primary barrier and below 1.79E-12 µSv/h at the secondary barriers. A comparative analysis of the EDR recorded behind the alternative barriers reveals that for the secondary barriers, the standard C8-FCB200-C8 configuration was fully adequate across the entire investigated tube voltage range (80 to 150 kVp). Conversely, for the primary barrier, the reinforced SS6-C8-FCB200-C8 composite is strictly required to provide sufficient shielding at 150 kVp. These results demonstrate the potential of locally available, lead-free composite materials as cost-effective and environmentally sustainable alternatives for radiation shielding in diagnostic radiology facilities while supporting optimisation and ALARA principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiological Protection
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aea2a0
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigations of lead-free multilayer shielding for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations

Jean Félix Beyala Ateba, Cébastien Joël Guembou Shouop, H. P. Ekobena Fouda, Bonaventure Mvogo Aloa et al.
Journal of Radiological Protection
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
article

Investigations of lead-free multilayer shielding for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations

Jean Félix Beyala Ateba, Cébastien Joël Guembou Shouop, H. P. Ekobena Fouda, Bonaventure Mvogo Aloa, MBOZEKO MOUONGUE François
article en

Abstract

The development of sustainable and lead-free shielding materials is of increasing interest for diagnostic radiology facilities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where cost, material availability, and environmental considerations are important factors. This study evaluates the radiation shielding performance of fired clay bricks (FCB), concrete, and stainless steel (SS) as alternative structural materials for X-ray facilities operating up to 150 kVp using Monte Carlo simulations with the PHITS code. Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers were computed to characterize photon attenuation properties and guide the design of multilayer shielding assemblies. Two concrete-encapsulated assemblies were engineered: a standard composite (C8-FCB200-C8, 2.32 mm lead equivalent) and a steel-reinforced composite (SS2-C8-FCB200-C8, 2.73 lead equivalent). Their performance was benchmarked against a conventional 2 mm lead barrier. Photon flux distributions and effective dose rates (EDR) were evaluated at primary (Cell 20) and secondary (Cells 22, 24, 26) shielding boundaries for X-ray tube potentials ranging from 80 to 150 kVp. At 150 kVp, the lead reference barrier reduced the transmitted EDR to 7.09E-09 µSv/h at the primary barrier and below 1.79E-12 µSv/h at the secondary barriers. A comparative analysis of the EDR recorded behind the alternative barriers reveals that for the secondary barriers, the standard C8-FCB200-C8 configuration was fully adequate across the entire investigated tube voltage range (80 to 150 kVp). Conversely, for the primary barrier, the reinforced SS6-C8-FCB200-C8 composite is strictly required to provide sufficient shielding at 150 kVp. These results demonstrate the potential of locally available, lead-free composite materials as cost-effective and environmentally sustainable alternatives for radiation shielding in diagnostic radiology facilities while supporting optimisation and ALARA principles.

Journal of Radiological Protection
Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.