When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to externally validate a published ratio of left adrenal aldosterone to calculated-right adrenal aldosterone (Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ) proposed to determine disease subtype when right-sided adrenal vein sampling is unsuccessful. Materials and methods This single-center retrospective study included 199 post-adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation adrenal vein sampling cases (2016–2025). A selectivity index ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic and lateralization index ≥ 4 indicated unilateral disease. The cAldosterone RAV was calculated as cAldosterone RAV = [2 × Aldosterone IVC × (Cortisol LAV /Cortisol IVC )]–Aldosterone LAV . The ratio of Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV determined disease subtype; published thresholds were ≥ 3 for left-sided and ≤ 0.33 for right-sided disease. Intermediate values were deemed bilateral disease. Sensitivities and specificities of this metric were calculated using standard AVS interpretation as the gold standard reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed on the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio derived institution-optimized thresholds by maximizing the Youden’s J statistic. Results Adrenal vein sampling was technically successful with determinate lateralization indices in 164 patients (41 left, 35 right, 88 bilateral). Using the published thresholds of 3 and 0.33, the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio had an overall accuracy of 43.3% (95% CI 35.9–50.9%). Institution-optimized thresholds of ≥ 32.43 (left-sided) and ≤ 0.56 (right-sided) improved the accuracy to 65.9% (95% CI 58.3–72.7%). Using institution-optimized thresholds, the sensitivities/specificities for the calculated right-sided, left-sided, and bilateral disease were 88.6%/95.3%, 92.7%/63.4%, and 44.3%/93.4%, respectively. Conclusions The Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CVIR Endovascular
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-026-00769-6
Primary Topic
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism

Vivek Bhalla, Matthew Hung, Andrew C. Picel, Jehan Z. Bahrainwala et al.
CVIR Endovascular
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
article

When “right” goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism

Vivek Bhalla, Matthew Hung, Andrew C. Picel, Jehan Z. Bahrainwala, Susan Seav, Saachi Datta, David Wang, Robin Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to externally validate a published ratio of left adrenal aldosterone to calculated-right adrenal aldosterone (Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ) proposed to determine disease subtype when right-sided adrenal vein sampling is unsuccessful. Materials and methods This single-center retrospective study included 199 post-adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation adrenal vein sampling cases (2016–2025). A selectivity index ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic and lateralization index ≥ 4 indicated unilateral disease. The cAldosterone RAV was calculated as cAldosterone RAV = [2 × Aldosterone IVC × (Cortisol LAV /Cortisol IVC )]–Aldosterone LAV . The ratio of Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV determined disease subtype; published thresholds were ≥ 3 for left-sided and ≤ 0.33 for right-sided disease. Intermediate values were deemed bilateral disease. Sensitivities and specificities of this metric were calculated using standard AVS interpretation as the gold standard reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed on the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio derived institution-optimized thresholds by maximizing the Youden’s J statistic. Results Adrenal vein sampling was technically successful with determinate lateralization indices in 164 patients (41 left, 35 right, 88 bilateral). Using the published thresholds of 3 and 0.33, the Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio had an overall accuracy of 43.3% (95% CI 35.9–50.9%). Institution-optimized thresholds of ≥ 32.43 (left-sided) and ≤ 0.56 (right-sided) improved the accuracy to 65.9% (95% CI 58.3–72.7%). Using institution-optimized thresholds, the sensitivities/specificities for the calculated right-sided, left-sided, and bilateral disease were 88.6%/95.3%, 92.7%/63.4%, and 44.3%/93.4%, respectively. Conclusions The Aldosterone LAV :cAldosterone RAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.

CVIR EndovascularVol. 9(1)
Palo Alto University (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.