Who is responsible for the carbon emissions of commercial buildings? Physical correlation of energy consumption and social interactions among stakeholders

Purpose Amid climate justice, pressure for equitable global carbon responsibility has cascaded from aggregate national targets down to the micro-level of individual buildings. Commercial buildings, with high operational carbon intensity and complex stakeholder interactions, face significant and escalating decarbonization pressure, making them a priority area in the built environment. This research aims to advance commercial buildings' operational carbon responsibility framework by analyzing critical stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach This research employs socio-technical systems theory to develop a novel two-mode “energy consumption network and social network” model. First, an energy-consumption network of physical equipment is modeled to identify key carbon-emitting devices. Second, a stakeholder network is constructed to identify entities responsible for those emissions. Finally, these networks are integrated, and a core-periphery analysis is conducted to reveal the critical linkages between social stakeholders and technical systems. Findings The results indicate that property management companies and building owners should bear primary responsibility, while governments play a crucial supervisory and enforcement role. The heating, ventilation and air conditioning, lighting and power systems are core energy-consuming equipment, with terminal systems, public area lighting and elevator systems serving as critical equipment nodes. Property managers' daily equipment control is the decisive intervention pathway. Research limitations/implications Although this research has fulfilled its core objective of identifying stakeholders responsible for specific carbon emissions during the operational stage of commercial buildings, subsequent work is needed to make substantive progress in quantifying the carbon responsibilities of different stakeholders. Originality/value Addressing the socio-technical integration gap in commercial buildings, this research provides actionable pathways to achieving net-zero goals in the built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2026-0374
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is responsible for the carbon emissions of commercial buildings? Physical correlation of energy consumption and social interactions among stakeholders

Yang Wang, Lingli Li, Eddie Chi Man Hui, Lei Yu et al.
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Who is responsible for the carbon emissions of commercial buildings? Physical correlation of energy consumption and social interactions among stakeholders

Yang Wang, Lingli Li, Eddie Chi Man Hui, Lei Yu, Bingqian Zhan, Dezhi Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose Amid climate justice, pressure for equitable global carbon responsibility has cascaded from aggregate national targets down to the micro-level of individual buildings. Commercial buildings, with high operational carbon intensity and complex stakeholder interactions, face significant and escalating decarbonization pressure, making them a priority area in the built environment. This research aims to advance commercial buildings' operational carbon responsibility framework by analyzing critical stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach This research employs socio-technical systems theory to develop a novel two-mode “energy consumption network and social network” model. First, an energy-consumption network of physical equipment is modeled to identify key carbon-emitting devices. Second, a stakeholder network is constructed to identify entities responsible for those emissions. Finally, these networks are integrated, and a core-periphery analysis is conducted to reveal the critical linkages between social stakeholders and technical systems. Findings The results indicate that property management companies and building owners should bear primary responsibility, while governments play a crucial supervisory and enforcement role. The heating, ventilation and air conditioning, lighting and power systems are core energy-consuming equipment, with terminal systems, public area lighting and elevator systems serving as critical equipment nodes. Property managers' daily equipment control is the decisive intervention pathway. Research limitations/implications Although this research has fulfilled its core objective of identifying stakeholders responsible for specific carbon emissions during the operational stage of commercial buildings, subsequent work is needed to make substantive progress in quantifying the carbon responsibilities of different stakeholders. Originality/value Addressing the socio-technical integration gap in commercial buildings, this research provides actionable pathways to achieving net-zero goals in the built environment.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Southeast University (BD), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.