Effects of farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies on Income Growth and Distribution: Evidence From China

ABSTRACT Agricultural green production technologies (GPTs) are critical for mitigating the negative environmental impacts of farming activities. However, farmers' willingness to adopt GPTs heavily depends on their impact on farmers' earnings, which can considerably vary. Empirical evidence so far has been inconclusive or contradictory regarding the impact of GPTs adoption on income distribution. This study uses survey data from 2034 farming households across 14 provinces in China to empirically investigate how GPTs adoption influences farmers' income and income distribution. We found a significant increase in the agricultural and total household income of farmers who adopted GPTs compared to those who did not. GPTs contribute to farmer's income growth through three main channels: reducing pesticide inputs increasing sales revenue from agricultural products and boosting agricultural output. Moreover, GPTs adoption has heterogenous effects on farmers' incomes. Farmers who are highly educated, relatively richer and operated larger farms tended to benefit more from adopting GPTs. Consequently, GPTs adoption exacerbates income inequality in rural society. Overall, this study highlights the potential side effects of promoting GPTs and calls for actions to address the distributional impacts of these environmental initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.70059
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies on Income Growth and Distribution: Evidence From China

Xinjie Shi, Xin Deng, LianGang Zhang, Changliang Shi et al.
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Effects of farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies on Income Growth and Distribution: Evidence From China

Xinjie Shi, Xin Deng, LianGang Zhang, Changliang Shi, Wei Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agricultural green production technologies (GPTs) are critical for mitigating the negative environmental impacts of farming activities. However, farmers' willingness to adopt GPTs heavily depends on their impact on farmers' earnings, which can considerably vary. Empirical evidence so far has been inconclusive or contradictory regarding the impact of GPTs adoption on income distribution. This study uses survey data from 2034 farming households across 14 provinces in China to empirically investigate how GPTs adoption influences farmers' income and income distribution. We found a significant increase in the agricultural and total household income of farmers who adopted GPTs compared to those who did not. GPTs contribute to farmer's income growth through three main channels: reducing pesticide inputs increasing sales revenue from agricultural products and boosting agricultural output. Moreover, GPTs adoption has heterogenous effects on farmers' incomes. Farmers who are highly educated, relatively richer and operated larger farms tended to benefit more from adopting GPTs. Consequently, GPTs adoption exacerbates income inequality in rural society. Overall, this study highlights the potential side effects of promoting GPTs and calls for actions to address the distributional impacts of these environmental initiatives.

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Southwest Forestry University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), Hunan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), Yangtze River Delta Physics Research Center (China) (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Communications (CN), The University of Adelaide (AU), Zhejiang University (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Lanzhou University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Department of Education of Zhejiang Province, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.