Feasibility and acceptability of the Multi-Modal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) programme in England: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background The Multi-Modal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) was initially developed and trialled in Australia. It consists of universal, selective, and indicated components, with evidence to suggest it may improve help-seeking and reduce suicide ideation. However, cultural transferability of interventions cannot be assumed, and so we needed to establish whether it would be feasible to trial MAPSS in English schools. Aim To assess the feasibility of delivering the MAPSS intervention in English secondary schools, including the acceptability and safety of delivering MAPSS, the social validity of MAPSS, and the feasibility of a future large-scale efficacy trial. Secondary aims were to assess changes over time in mental health and wellbeing outcomes for students. Method A two-year cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) design was conducted. Schools (n = 6) were randomly assigned to implement MAPSS (n = 4) or continue their usual practice (UP) (n = 2). Participants were students (n = 887) in Year 10 (aged 14–15 years) attending participating schools. Quantitative data were collected from participants online at four timepoints (baseline, post-universal component, post-indicated component, one-year follow-up). Trial feasibility was assessed through monitoring of recruitment, attrition, missing data, participant engagement, acceptability of intervention components, and estimated change across time and variability in the primary outcome measures. Safety was assessed through the monitoring of adverse events. Results The progression criteria indicated strong feasibility for advancing MAPSS to a full effectiveness trial, with six of nine stop/go criteria fully achieved and three partially met but with solutions identified. The intervention was shown to be acceptable and safe, with no adverse events reported. Post-intervention, scores for suicidal ideation, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness in the MAPSS group were lower than in the control group, and help-seeking also improved in the MAPSS group. Conclusion All progression criteria were met or appropriate solutions were identified, supporting further evaluation of the intervention in a full-scale effectiveness trial. These findings add to the growing evidence base supporting the utility of multi-modal suicide prevention programmes in schools. MAPSS has potential as a school-based intervention for those struggling with suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Registration: The trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ISRCTN41891301) on 9th February 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-10071-4
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and acceptability of the Multi-Modal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) programme in England: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Samuel McKay, Shuye Yu, Jo Robinson, Molly McCarthy et al.
4 links
Trials
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Feasibility and acceptability of the Multi-Modal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) programme in England: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Samuel McKay, Shuye Yu, Jo Robinson, Molly McCarthy, Vivienne Crosbie, Maria Michail, Pooja Saini, Ana Duarte, Neil Humphrey, Emma Ashworth, Laura Sambrook, Steven Lane, Mani Jalota, Sio Wynne, Neil Boardman, Amy Barker, Sian Ibotson, Kate Henderson, Mike Palmer, Andy Airey, Tim Owen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Multi-Modal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) was initially developed and trialled in Australia. It consists of universal, selective, and indicated components, with evidence to suggest it may improve help-seeking and reduce suicide ideation. However, cultural transferability of interventions cannot be assumed, and so we needed to establish whether it would be feasible to trial MAPSS in English schools. Aim To assess the feasibility of delivering the MAPSS intervention in English secondary schools, including the acceptability and safety of delivering MAPSS, the social validity of MAPSS, and the feasibility of a future large-scale efficacy trial. Secondary aims were to assess changes over time in mental health and wellbeing outcomes for students. Method A two-year cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) design was conducted. Schools (n = 6) were randomly assigned to implement MAPSS (n = 4) or continue their usual practice (UP) (n = 2). Participants were students (n = 887) in Year 10 (aged 14–15 years) attending participating schools. Quantitative data were collected from participants online at four timepoints (baseline, post-universal component, post-indicated component, one-year follow-up). Trial feasibility was assessed through monitoring of recruitment, attrition, missing data, participant engagement, acceptability of intervention components, and estimated change across time and variability in the primary outcome measures. Safety was assessed through the monitoring of adverse events. Results The progression criteria indicated strong feasibility for advancing MAPSS to a full effectiveness trial, with six of nine stop/go criteria fully achieved and three partially met but with solutions identified. The intervention was shown to be acceptable and safe, with no adverse events reported. Post-intervention, scores for suicidal ideation, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness in the MAPSS group were lower than in the control group, and help-seeking also improved in the MAPSS group. Conclusion All progression criteria were met or appropriate solutions were identified, supporting further evaluation of the intervention in a full-scale effectiveness trial. These findings add to the growing evidence base supporting the utility of multi-modal suicide prevention programmes in schools. MAPSS has potential as a school-based intervention for those struggling with suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Registration: The trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ISRCTN41891301) on 9th February 2024.

Trials
University of Liverpool (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Manchester (GB), Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Champs Public Health Collaborative (GB), Alder Hey Children's Hospital (GB), University of York (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Good health and well-being, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon