How Credit Card Dispute Resolution Works: A Systems Design Perspective

This article, the first in a two-part series on payments-systems engineering, takes a systems-design view of credit card dispute resolution. It walks through the publicly documented chargeback lifecycle and shows how engineers model it as an explicit state machine - including loop-backs such as re-bills and reopened cases, and distinct outcomes where "withdrawn" is not "merchant won." It introduces a practitioner's Four-Layer Dispute Model (policy, state, orchestration, evidence) that separates frequently changing rules from stable workflow, and covers case correlation, deadline-driven prioritization, reason-code-specific evidence capture, and skill-based routing. The article is vendor-neutral and based solely on public card-network rules and publicly available knowledge. A companion article covers fraud detection and recovery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22307815
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

How Credit Card Dispute Resolution Works: A Systems Design Perspective

Mihir Shah
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
preprint

How Credit Card Dispute Resolution Works: A Systems Design Perspective

Mihir Shah
preprint en

Abstract

This article, the first in a two-part series on payments-systems engineering, takes a systems-design view of credit card dispute resolution. It walks through the publicly documented chargeback lifecycle and shows how engineers model it as an explicit state machine - including loop-backs such as re-bills and reopened cases, and distinct outcomes where "withdrawn" is not "merchant won." It introduces a practitioner's Four-Layer Dispute Model (policy, state, orchestration, evidence) that separates frequently changing rules from stable workflow, and covers case correlation, deadline-driven prioritization, reason-code-specific evidence capture, and skill-based routing. The article is vendor-neutral and based solely on public card-network rules and publicly available knowledge. A companion article covers fraud detection and recovery.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.