Mixed-Methods User-Centered Design Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes System to Enhance Postdischarge Care for Thoracic Surgery Patients

INTRODUCTION: Health information technology (HIT) tools intended to remotely monitor patients' symptoms using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical outcomes; however, successful design requires meeting the unique needs of complex end user groups. Therefore, we applied a user-centered design approach to iteratively evaluate and inform improvements to an ePRO system designed for postdischarge thoracic surgery care, incorporating perspectives of patient, caregiver, and provider end users. METHODS: We purposively recruited a targeted sample of thoracic surgery patients, their caregivers, and providers to participate in field observations and semi-structured interviews; patients additionally completed the System Usability Scale and Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire to assess usability. The research team synthesized data through iterative modeling, which was subsequently validated through a mixed end user focus group. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis guided by the Systems Approach to Health Care Delivery and Lean Six Sigma 6 Ms frameworks. RESULTS: A total of 16 end users participated, including patients (n = 4), caregivers (n = 2), and 10 providers representing distinct segmented user groups of nurses (n = 4) and surgeons (n = 6). Emergent themes centered on user expectations, personalization, relationships, communication, and accessibility. Participants also highlighted the survey's brevity, responsiveness of the care team, opportunities to strengthen patient and provider training, the need for clearer communication regarding ePRO use, and preferences for more contextualized alerts. Findings informed specific recommendations for system optimization. CONCLUSIONS: The user-centered design approach generated rich insights into end user experiences, expectations, and interactions with the ePRO system. Future design efforts should focus on improvements that better support the diverse needs, workflows, and contexts of complex end users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Research
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.08.002
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-Methods User-Centered Design Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes System to Enhance Postdischarge Care for Thoracic Surgery Patients

Meghan C. O’Leary, Gita N. Mody, Chase Cox, Amanda Gentry et al.
Journal of Surgical Research
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Mixed-Methods User-Centered Design Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes System to Enhance Postdischarge Care for Thoracic Surgery Patients

Meghan C. O’Leary, Gita N. Mody, Chase Cox, Amanda Gentry, Julie Johnson, Elizabeth Kwong, Lukasz Mazur
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health information technology (HIT) tools intended to remotely monitor patients' symptoms using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical outcomes; however, successful design requires meeting the unique needs of complex end user groups. Therefore, we applied a user-centered design approach to iteratively evaluate and inform improvements to an ePRO system designed for postdischarge thoracic surgery care, incorporating perspectives of patient, caregiver, and provider end users. METHODS: We purposively recruited a targeted sample of thoracic surgery patients, their caregivers, and providers to participate in field observations and semi-structured interviews; patients additionally completed the System Usability Scale and Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire to assess usability. The research team synthesized data through iterative modeling, which was subsequently validated through a mixed end user focus group. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis guided by the Systems Approach to Health Care Delivery and Lean Six Sigma 6 Ms frameworks. RESULTS: A total of 16 end users participated, including patients (n = 4), caregivers (n = 2), and 10 providers representing distinct segmented user groups of nurses (n = 4) and surgeons (n = 6). Emergent themes centered on user expectations, personalization, relationships, communication, and accessibility. Participants also highlighted the survey's brevity, responsiveness of the care team, opportunities to strengthen patient and provider training, the need for clearer communication regarding ePRO use, and preferences for more contextualized alerts. Findings informed specific recommendations for system optimization. CONCLUSIONS: The user-centered design approach generated rich insights into end user experiences, expectations, and interactions with the ePRO system. Future design efforts should focus on improvements that better support the diverse needs, workflows, and contexts of complex end users.

Journal of Surgical ResearchVol. 326
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.