Opacity and the boundaries of knowing : beyond recognition in the reception of contemporary Indigenous art

This thesis examines the value of intentionally opaque elements in contemporary Indigenous art from the perspective of a non-Indigenous viewer. When an artwork uses opacity to resist immediate comprehension, it refuses streamlined access to meaning and challenges viewers to deepen their mode of engagement. Rather than approaching artworks through optical transparency, viewers must pivot towards affective and reflective forms of engagement. Encounters with opacity privilege contemplation over consumption and create opportunities for learning through discomfort and uncertainty. Drawing on the work of Édouard Glissant alongside scholarship in Indigenous studies, art history, decolonial theory, and visual culture, this research situates opacity within broader critiques of colonial systems that impose asymmetrical demands for transparency and legibility. Glissant's concept of the "right to opacity" provides the central theoretical framework for arguing that opacity does not operate as invisibility or withdrawal but a modality that enables Indigenous artists to assert forms of self-determination that go beyond colonial systems of recognition. In both the production and reception of contemporary Indigenous art, opacity creates the conditions for intercultural exchange while protecting irreducible difference. Through close visual analyses of artworks by Marianne Nicolson (Dzawada'enuxw), Audie Murray (Cree-Métis), and Nadia Myre (Kitigan Zibi Anishinaabeg), this thesis examines how opacity operates as both an artistic strategy and a critical pedagogy. Through its ability to simultaneously separate and connects viewers, opacity reveals that artworks do not always address a single, universal public. Instead, encounters with opacity bring into focus multiple, overlapping publics with different access to language, history and cultural knowledge. Rather than constituting pedagogical failure, opacity becomes the condition through which more ethical and self-reflexive forms of relation emerge. By making the boundaries of knowledge and access perceptible, opacity demonstrates that reconciliation cannot be achieved through recognition alone but requires sustained engagement with Indigenous sovereignty and the enduring realities of colonialism. Ultimately, this thesis argues that opacity paces and spaces the encounter between artwork and viewer, creating the conditions for more accountable intercultural relations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0455980
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opacity and the boundaries of knowing : beyond recognition in the reception of contemporary Indigenous art

Jamie Lewis
Open Collections
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Opacity and the boundaries of knowing : beyond recognition in the reception of contemporary Indigenous art

Jamie Lewis
article en

Abstract

This thesis examines the value of intentionally opaque elements in contemporary Indigenous art from the perspective of a non-Indigenous viewer. When an artwork uses opacity to resist immediate comprehension, it refuses streamlined access to meaning and challenges viewers to deepen their mode of engagement. Rather than approaching artworks through optical transparency, viewers must pivot towards affective and reflective forms of engagement. Encounters with opacity privilege contemplation over consumption and create opportunities for learning through discomfort and uncertainty. Drawing on the work of Édouard Glissant alongside scholarship in Indigenous studies, art history, decolonial theory, and visual culture, this research situates opacity within broader critiques of colonial systems that impose asymmetrical demands for transparency and legibility. Glissant's concept of the "right to opacity" provides the central theoretical framework for arguing that opacity does not operate as invisibility or withdrawal but a modality that enables Indigenous artists to assert forms of self-determination that go beyond colonial systems of recognition. In both the production and reception of contemporary Indigenous art, opacity creates the conditions for intercultural exchange while protecting irreducible difference. Through close visual analyses of artworks by Marianne Nicolson (Dzawada'enuxw), Audie Murray (Cree-Métis), and Nadia Myre (Kitigan Zibi Anishinaabeg), this thesis examines how opacity operates as both an artistic strategy and a critical pedagogy. Through its ability to simultaneously separate and connects viewers, opacity reveals that artworks do not always address a single, universal public. Instead, encounters with opacity bring into focus multiple, overlapping publics with different access to language, history and cultural knowledge. Rather than constituting pedagogical failure, opacity becomes the condition through which more ethical and self-reflexive forms of relation emerge. By making the boundaries of knowledge and access perceptible, opacity demonstrates that reconciliation cannot be achieved through recognition alone but requires sustained engagement with Indigenous sovereignty and the enduring realities of colonialism. Ultimately, this thesis argues that opacity paces and spaces the encounter between artwork and viewer, creating the conditions for more accountable intercultural relations.

Open Collections
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.