Diagnostic Accuracy of Fat Pad Sampling and Bone Marrow Biopsy for AL Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of abdominal fat pad sampling and bone marrow biopsy for immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis using organ biopsy as the reference standard. We searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception through March 2024. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). After deduplication, 29,237 records were screened, and 31 studies were included. Twenty-five studies (n=4,649) reported on fat pad sampling, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI 0.72-0.81), while twenty studies (n=2,771) reported on bone marrow biopsy, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.55 (0.46-0.63). All studies enrolled patients with confirmed disease, specificity was not reported in the included studies. Fat pad aspiration (15 studies, n=1,590) and surgical or punch biopsy (4 studies, n=222) showed similar sensitivities of 0.80 (0.76-0.83) and 0.77 (0.61-0.88), respectively. In a single study (n=612), performing both tests together yielded a sensitivity of 0.89. COE was judged to be Moderate for fat pad sampling and Low for bone marrow biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026021240
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fat Pad Sampling and Bone Marrow Biopsy for AL Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Angela Dispenzieri, Matthew D. Seftel, Jack Khouri, María Adela Aguirre et al.
Blood Advances
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fat Pad Sampling and Bone Marrow Biopsy for AL Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Angela Dispenzieri, Matthew D. Seftel, Jack Khouri, María Adela Aguirre, Vaishali Sanchorawala, Nelson Leung, Antonia Carroll, Muayad Azzam, Naresh Bumma, Aseel Alkhader, Jamil Nazzal, Shahzad Raza, Hadi Khaled Abou Zeid, Nitasha Sarswat, Joselle Cook, Reem A. Mustafa, Daulath Singh, Maria M. Picken, Deborah Boedicker, Hassan Kawtharany, Faizi Jamal, Iktimal Alwan, Tala Khraise, Nour Jaber, Mohammad M. AlMasri, Hira Shaikh, Alfredo De La Torre, Raymond Comenzo, Qais Hamarsha, Vishal Kukreti, Noel R Dasgupta
article en

Abstract

In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of abdominal fat pad sampling and bone marrow biopsy for immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis using organ biopsy as the reference standard. We searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception through March 2024. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). After deduplication, 29,237 records were screened, and 31 studies were included. Twenty-five studies (n=4,649) reported on fat pad sampling, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI 0.72-0.81), while twenty studies (n=2,771) reported on bone marrow biopsy, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.55 (0.46-0.63). All studies enrolled patients with confirmed disease, specificity was not reported in the included studies. Fat pad aspiration (15 studies, n=1,590) and surgical or punch biopsy (4 studies, n=222) showed similar sensitivities of 0.80 (0.76-0.83) and 0.77 (0.61-0.88), respectively. In a single study (n=612), performing both tests together yielded a sensitivity of 0.89. COE was judged to be Moderate for fat pad sampling and Low for bone marrow biopsy.

Blood Advances
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Loyola University Medical Center (US), Sparrow Health System (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Valparaiso University (US), Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR), Sparrow Hospital (US), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), University of Chicago (US), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Greenfield Research (Canada) (CA), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Hamilton Medical Center (US), AdventHealth Tampa (US), Saint Luke's East Hospital (US), Iowa City Public Library (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, NSCAD University (CA), Wake Forest University (US), Saint Louis University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Canadian Blood Services (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.