Profiles of distressing experiences associated with school attendance problems among Japanese students: differences in strengths and positive experiences

Abstract Background School attendance problems (SAPs) have increased globally, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, making it essential to understand the related factors and countermeasures. This study aimed to identify profiles of distressing experiences associated with SAPs based on students’ subjective perspectives, focusing on the factors amenable to change through intervention and self-perceived strengths and enjoyment. Methods This study used data from a Japanese project exploring factors associated with SAPs. A total of 178 schools (91 elementary, 48 junior high, 3 compulsory education, and 36 high schools) and 25,257 individuals participated in this project. Students were asked about 23 items of distressing experiences at school or at home and 10 items of self-perceived strengths and enjoyment during the previous school year. The teacher provided information on whether the student had special educational needs, diagnosed or suspected illness or disability, or physical or psychological problems, along with information on the students’ families and siblings’ backgrounds. Responses from 18,950 students (75.0%) were analyzed using latent class analysis. The association between identified classes and students’ background factors was explored using a three-step estimation approach. Results Six profiles were identified: adaptive ( n = 5,828, 30.8%), psychosomatic/sleep irregularity ( n = 4,112, 21.7%), academic difficulty ( n = 3,337, 17.6%), academic and psychosomatic/sleep irregularity ( n = 3,176, 16.8%), moderate pervasive difficulty ( n = 1,760, 9.3%), and severe pervasive difficulty ( n = 737, 3.9%). Annual absences exceeding 30 days (15%) were relatively rare in the adaptive and academic difficulty classes. Conversely, the severe pervasive difficulty class exhibited the highest levels of absenteeism and the fewest strengths and positive experiences. Conclusion Multiple difficulties at school or at home, combined with fewer strengths and positive experiences, were associated with SAPs. Understanding these differentiated profiles provides a valuable foundation for developing individualized, multi-tiered interventions. Simultaneously, it is important to support students’ strengths and increase their enjoyment to prevent SAPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05520-3
Primary Topic
Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profiles of distressing experiences associated with school attendance problems among Japanese students: differences in strengths and positive experiences

Kohei Kurita, Michio Takahashi, Manabu Wakuta, Taiichi Katayama et al.
BMC Psychology
Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
article

Profiles of distressing experiences associated with school attendance problems among Japanese students: differences in strengths and positive experiences

Kohei Kurita, Michio Takahashi, Manabu Wakuta, Taiichi Katayama, Tomoko Nishimura, Hiroyuki Mori, Ikuko Hirata, Yuko Osuka, Nobuaki Tsukui, Ikue Hirata, Masaki Adachi, Atsushi Senju, Masako Taniike
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background School attendance problems (SAPs) have increased globally, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, making it essential to understand the related factors and countermeasures. This study aimed to identify profiles of distressing experiences associated with SAPs based on students’ subjective perspectives, focusing on the factors amenable to change through intervention and self-perceived strengths and enjoyment. Methods This study used data from a Japanese project exploring factors associated with SAPs. A total of 178 schools (91 elementary, 48 junior high, 3 compulsory education, and 36 high schools) and 25,257 individuals participated in this project. Students were asked about 23 items of distressing experiences at school or at home and 10 items of self-perceived strengths and enjoyment during the previous school year. The teacher provided information on whether the student had special educational needs, diagnosed or suspected illness or disability, or physical or psychological problems, along with information on the students’ families and siblings’ backgrounds. Responses from 18,950 students (75.0%) were analyzed using latent class analysis. The association between identified classes and students’ background factors was explored using a three-step estimation approach. Results Six profiles were identified: adaptive ( n = 5,828, 30.8%), psychosomatic/sleep irregularity ( n = 4,112, 21.7%), academic difficulty ( n = 3,337, 17.6%), academic and psychosomatic/sleep irregularity ( n = 3,176, 16.8%), moderate pervasive difficulty ( n = 1,760, 9.3%), and severe pervasive difficulty ( n = 737, 3.9%). Annual absences exceeding 30 days (15%) were relatively rare in the adaptive and academic difficulty classes. Conversely, the severe pervasive difficulty class exhibited the highest levels of absenteeism and the fewest strengths and positive experiences. Conclusion Multiple difficulties at school or at home, combined with fewer strengths and positive experiences, were associated with SAPs. Understanding these differentiated profiles provides a valuable foundation for developing individualized, multi-tiered interventions. Simultaneously, it is important to support students’ strengths and increase their enjoyment to prevent SAPs.

BMC Psychology
Kanazawa University (JP), Meiji Gakuin University (JP), Waseda University (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Saitama Gakuen University (JP), Shizuoka Institute of Science and Technology (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JST-Mirai Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.