Examining veteran preferences and attitudes across intervention modalities for posttraumatic stress disorder

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care can be delivered in person or via telehealth as well as through computer- and app-based programs. Receiving PTSD care through a preferred modality improves engagement and outcomes, but little is known about veterans' modality preferences. This study describes veterans' preferences for and perceptions of four modalities of PTSD care (i.e., in-person, telehealth, computer-based, app-based) and identifies predictors of preference for digital modalities. Veterans with PTSD (N = 615) completed a survey assessing interest in and perceptions of PTSD care modalities and factors that might influence preferences (e.g., sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors). Veterans were classified into three groups: prefer digital interventions (n = 122), open to digital interventions (n = 180), and not interested in digital interventions (n = 313). Veterans were most interested in in-person care, followed by telehealth, computer-based, and app-based modalities, with substantial variability. One in two veterans preferred or were open to digital modalities, yet few reported prior knowledge of them. PTSD service-connected veterans and those higher in self-stigma of help-seeking were more likely to prefer or be open to digital modalities. Perceptions of and familiarity with in-person, telehealth, and computer-based modalities also predicted preferences. Dissemination recommendations are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70122
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining veteran preferences and attitudes across intervention modalities for posttraumatic stress disorder

Eve A. Rosenfeld, Casey L. Straud, Carmen P. McLean, Craig S. Rosen et al.
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Examining veteran preferences and attitudes across intervention modalities for posttraumatic stress disorder

Eve A. Rosenfeld, Casey L. Straud, Carmen P. McLean, Craig S. Rosen, Nadia Malek, Sheila M. Thompson
article en

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care can be delivered in person or via telehealth as well as through computer- and app-based programs. Receiving PTSD care through a preferred modality improves engagement and outcomes, but little is known about veterans' modality preferences. This study describes veterans' preferences for and perceptions of four modalities of PTSD care (i.e., in-person, telehealth, computer-based, app-based) and identifies predictors of preference for digital modalities. Veterans with PTSD (N = 615) completed a survey assessing interest in and perceptions of PTSD care modalities and factors that might influence preferences (e.g., sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors). Veterans were classified into three groups: prefer digital interventions (n = 122), open to digital interventions (n = 180), and not interested in digital interventions (n = 313). Veterans were most interested in in-person care, followed by telehealth, computer-based, and app-based modalities, with substantial variability. One in two veterans preferred or were open to digital modalities, yet few reported prior knowledge of them. PTSD service-connected veterans and those higher in self-stigma of help-seeking were more likely to prefer or be open to digital modalities. Perceptions of and familiarity with in-person, telehealth, and computer-based modalities also predicted preferences. Dissemination recommendations are discussed.

Journal of Traumatic Stress
Palo Alto University (US), National Center for PTSD (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.