Development and clinical translation of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease: a structured review

Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in the prodromal and early clinically evident stages, when symptoms are subtle and phenotypically overlap with other mimicking disorders. The widespread availability of smartphones equipped with inertial, acoustic, touchscreen, and geolocation sensors has enabled the emergence of smartphone-based digital biomarkers that capture continuous, real-world motor and non-motor manifestations of PD. To critically review the validation state, construct validity, clinical applications, and potential for longitudinal monitoring of smartphone-derived digital biomarkers for early PD detection and for differential diagnosis from mimicking disorders, while addressing methodological, regulatory, and implementation challenges. This manuscript reviews the current evidence on smartphone-based active and passive digital assessments for the early diagnosis and screening of PD. We examine clinical validation and implementation, as well as advances in technological processing, multimodal digital phenotyping, and machine learning models, for the early detection and screening of PD. Smartphone-derived digital markers demonstrate promising capability for detecting several symptoms and support early diagnosis of PD. A total of 30 studies showed significant correlations of such markers with established clinical scales and suggested utility in differentiating PD from other Parkinsonian syndromes and prodromal PD patients. Six major categories based on the clinical assessment were identified: 8 studies with voice-based assessment, 6 with touchscreen-based assessment, 4 with video-recording assessment, 4 with inertial measurement unit-based assessment, 7 with multimodal assessment approaches, and 1 with questionnaire-based smartphone assessment. However, substantial limitations persist, including device and protocol heterogeneity, limited external validation, small datasets, algorithmic bias, inadequate explainability, and inconsistent reporting standards. Smartphone-based digital biomarkers offer a promising approach to improving diagnostic accuracy in PD and are emerging as a frontier in precision neurology and scalable PD care. However, these findings have several limitations and should be interpreted with caution. Future research should prioritise multicentre longitudinal validation, multimodal integration, explainable AI, and real-world deployment to establish clinically actionable digital biomarkers for early PD detection and differential diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-026-03269-y
Primary Topic
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and clinical translation of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease: a structured review

Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Andrea Pilotto, Walter Maetzler, Peerapon Vateekul et al.
Journal of Neural Transmission
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Development and clinical translation of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease: a structured review

Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Andrea Pilotto, Walter Maetzler, Peerapon Vateekul, Decho Surangsrirat, Onanong Phokaewvarangkul, Genko Oyama, Chaewon Shin, Suppakorn Yamutai
article en

Abstract

Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in the prodromal and early clinically evident stages, when symptoms are subtle and phenotypically overlap with other mimicking disorders. The widespread availability of smartphones equipped with inertial, acoustic, touchscreen, and geolocation sensors has enabled the emergence of smartphone-based digital biomarkers that capture continuous, real-world motor and non-motor manifestations of PD. To critically review the validation state, construct validity, clinical applications, and potential for longitudinal monitoring of smartphone-derived digital biomarkers for early PD detection and for differential diagnosis from mimicking disorders, while addressing methodological, regulatory, and implementation challenges. This manuscript reviews the current evidence on smartphone-based active and passive digital assessments for the early diagnosis and screening of PD. We examine clinical validation and implementation, as well as advances in technological processing, multimodal digital phenotyping, and machine learning models, for the early detection and screening of PD. Smartphone-derived digital markers demonstrate promising capability for detecting several symptoms and support early diagnosis of PD. A total of 30 studies showed significant correlations of such markers with established clinical scales and suggested utility in differentiating PD from other Parkinsonian syndromes and prodromal PD patients. Six major categories based on the clinical assessment were identified: 8 studies with voice-based assessment, 6 with touchscreen-based assessment, 4 with video-recording assessment, 4 with inertial measurement unit-based assessment, 7 with multimodal assessment approaches, and 1 with questionnaire-based smartphone assessment. However, substantial limitations persist, including device and protocol heterogeneity, limited external validation, small datasets, algorithmic bias, inadequate explainability, and inconsistent reporting standards. Smartphone-based digital biomarkers offer a promising approach to improving diagnostic accuracy in PD and are emerging as a frontier in precision neurology and scalable PD care. However, these findings have several limitations and should be interpreted with caution. Future research should prioritise multicentre longitudinal validation, multimodal integration, explainable AI, and real-world deployment to establish clinically actionable digital biomarkers for early PD detection and differential diagnosis.

Journal of Neural Transmission
Thai Red Cross Society (TH), National Science and Technology Development Agency (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), The Royal College Of Anesthesiologists Of Thailand (TH), Office of the Royal Society, University of Brescia (IT), Saitama Medical University (JP), University of Lübeck (DE)
Chulalongkorn University, National Research Council of Thailand, Saitama Medical University, Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.