Whose Emotional Intelligence Counts? Behaviour, Competence and the Organisational Interpretation of Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence (EI) has become a defining feature of leadership development, recruitment and performance management. We argue, however, that as EI has become embedded within organisational practice, its assessment has gradually shifted from recognising emotional capability to rewarding familiar patterns of emotional behaviour. This distinction has received little attention but has important implications for leadership, talent management and workplace inclusion. We argue that organisations may inadvertently privilege particular styles of emotional expression while overlooking equally effective, but different, ways of demonstrating emotional competence. Neurodivergence brings this distinction into particularly sharp focus, as emotional capability may be expressed in ways that differ from dominant organisational expectations. Rather than abandoning EI, we propose a broader interpretation of emotional capability that distinguishes underlying emotional understanding from its behavioural presentation, enabling organisations to recognise a wider range of emotionally intelligent leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Published
2026-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863261488856
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Whose Emotional Intelligence Counts? Behaviour, Competence and the Organisational Interpretation of Emotional Intelligence

Ceri Pimblett, Mariann Hardey
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

Whose Emotional Intelligence Counts? Behaviour, Competence and the Organisational Interpretation of Emotional Intelligence

Ceri Pimblett, Mariann Hardey
article en

Abstract

Emotional Intelligence (EI) has become a defining feature of leadership development, recruitment and performance management. We argue, however, that as EI has become embedded within organisational practice, its assessment has gradually shifted from recognising emotional capability to rewarding familiar patterns of emotional behaviour. This distinction has received little attention but has important implications for leadership, talent management and workplace inclusion. We argue that organisations may inadvertently privilege particular styles of emotional expression while overlooking equally effective, but different, ways of demonstrating emotional competence. Neurodivergence brings this distinction into particularly sharp focus, as emotional capability may be expressed in ways that differ from dominant organisational expectations. Rather than abandoning EI, we propose a broader interpretation of emotional capability that distinguishes underlying emotional understanding from its behavioural presentation, enabling organisations to recognise a wider range of emotionally intelligent leadership.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
University of Chester (GB), Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whose Emotional Intelligence Counts? Behaviour, Competence and the Organisational Interpretation of Emotional Intelligence — Ceri Pimblett, Mariann Hardey · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS