Validation of a nutrition and food insecurity scale for older adults

Background Food insecurity among older adults is influenced by financial, physical and functional barriers that may not be captured by existing screening tools. This study validated the Older Adult Food Insecurity Scale (OAFIS), a multidimensional assessment designed specifically for older adults. Methods 72 community-dwelling older adults (66–87 years) from Florida completed the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Security Survey Module (FSSM) and the 22-item OAFIS. Registered dietitian nutritionists conducted comprehensive assessments to classify food security status. Internal consistency, factor structure and criterion-related validity were evaluated. Results The OAFIS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.77) and identified four domains: mobility/physical limitations, access limitations, financial limitations and bodily function issues. OAFIS scores correlated strongly with dietitian assessments (r=0.69) and moderately with FSSM scores (r=0.57). The FSSM explained only 34% of the variance in dietitian-assigned classifications and was associated with financial and access domains but not mobility or bodily function domains. Brief 8-item and 4-item screeners were also developed. Conclusions The OAFIS provides a valid multidimensional measure of food and nutrition insecurity among older adults, capturing important physical and functional barriers overlooked by traditional screening tools. The instrument may improve identification of at-risk older adults in clinical and community settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2026-001569
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a nutrition and food insecurity scale for older adults

Lauri Wright, Jess Dobbins, Jenifer Ross, Jenna Pennella et al.
BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Validation of a nutrition and food insecurity scale for older adults

Lauri Wright, Jess Dobbins, Jenifer Ross, Jenna Pennella, Paul Fuglestad
article en

Abstract

Background Food insecurity among older adults is influenced by financial, physical and functional barriers that may not be captured by existing screening tools. This study validated the Older Adult Food Insecurity Scale (OAFIS), a multidimensional assessment designed specifically for older adults. Methods 72 community-dwelling older adults (66–87 years) from Florida completed the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Security Survey Module (FSSM) and the 22-item OAFIS. Registered dietitian nutritionists conducted comprehensive assessments to classify food security status. Internal consistency, factor structure and criterion-related validity were evaluated. Results The OAFIS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.77) and identified four domains: mobility/physical limitations, access limitations, financial limitations and bodily function issues. OAFIS scores correlated strongly with dietitian assessments (r=0.69) and moderately with FSSM scores (r=0.57). The FSSM explained only 34% of the variance in dietitian-assigned classifications and was associated with financial and access domains but not mobility or bodily function domains. Brief 8-item and 4-item screeners were also developed. Conclusions The OAFIS provides a valid multidimensional measure of food and nutrition insecurity among older adults, capturing important physical and functional barriers overlooked by traditional screening tools. The instrument may improve identification of at-risk older adults in clinical and community settings.

BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health
University of North Florida (US), University of South Florida (US), Humana (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.