Improving the Outlook for Infectious Disease Control in the United States Through State‐Led Initiatives

Policy Points This is a pivotal time for state leaders and policymakers to lean into opportunities to enhance infectious disease control in the United States. There are extensive opportunities for state-led initiatives to be influential in the areas of public health infectious disease detection, public health funding, and public health infrastructure. It is imperative to remember that "all responses are local" and that the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states. CONTEXT: Over the last decade, the United States has encountered numerous infectious disease-related public health threats, observed declines in life expectancy and childhood vaccination rates, and experienced rapid changes and reorganizations to the domestic public health system. There is a window of opportunity for state leaders and policymakers to strengthen state, tribal, local, and territorial public health infrastructure amidst a changing federal landscape in order to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States. METHODS: This perspective synthesizes evidence from the public health literature and draws on the collective experience of the authors working in the applied public health field. We offer considerations for state leaders and policymakers to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States though state-led initiatives and direction. FINDINGS: century. Recent changes and relative instability at the federal level are noteworthy; however, "all responses are local" and the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states. CONCLUSIONS: State leaders have a duty and responsibility to protect the health of their population and ensure a posture of readiness to effectively respond to infectious disease health threats. States can step forward and embrace innovation in this space to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States prior to the next emerging infectious disease public health threat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Milbank Quarterly
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70122
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Outlook for Infectious Disease Control in the United States Through State‐Led Initiatives

MARY‐MARGARET A. FILL, WILLIAM SCHAFFNER
Milbank Quarterly
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Improving the Outlook for Infectious Disease Control in the United States Through State‐Led Initiatives

MARY‐MARGARET A. FILL, WILLIAM SCHAFFNER
article en

Abstract

Policy Points This is a pivotal time for state leaders and policymakers to lean into opportunities to enhance infectious disease control in the United States. There are extensive opportunities for state-led initiatives to be influential in the areas of public health infectious disease detection, public health funding, and public health infrastructure. It is imperative to remember that "all responses are local" and that the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states. CONTEXT: Over the last decade, the United States has encountered numerous infectious disease-related public health threats, observed declines in life expectancy and childhood vaccination rates, and experienced rapid changes and reorganizations to the domestic public health system. There is a window of opportunity for state leaders and policymakers to strengthen state, tribal, local, and territorial public health infrastructure amidst a changing federal landscape in order to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States. METHODS: This perspective synthesizes evidence from the public health literature and draws on the collective experience of the authors working in the applied public health field. We offer considerations for state leaders and policymakers to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States though state-led initiatives and direction. FINDINGS: century. Recent changes and relative instability at the federal level are noteworthy; however, "all responses are local" and the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states. CONCLUSIONS: State leaders have a duty and responsibility to protect the health of their population and ensure a posture of readiness to effectively respond to infectious disease health threats. States can step forward and embrace innovation in this space to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States prior to the next emerging infectious disease public health threat.

Milbank Quarterly
Vanderbilt University (US), Tennessee Department of Health (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.