Grounding teacher induction in lived needs: a four-phase model for novice teachers in Iran

Despite extensive international research on teacher induction, models of early career support remain largely Western-centric and predominantly focused on pedagogical mentoring. In Iran, structured induction systems remain underdeveloped and insufficiently responsive to local professional realities. This paper develops a contextually grounded, multidimensional support model for novice teachers in Iran. Using a four-phase qualitative design, the research combined (1) a meta-synthesis, (2) grounded theory interviews, (3) a modified Delphi needs assessment, and (4) theory synthesis. This sequential design enabled systematic integration of global evidence with locally articulated priorities. Findings indicate that while international literature emphasises instructional mentoring and retention, novice teachers in Iran prioritise economic stability, social integration, and administrative clarity alongside pedagogical development. These priorities reveal a disconnect between pre-service preparation and workplace realities and challenge dominant induction paradigms that foreground pedagogy alone. The resulting model reconceptualises induction as a comprehensive professional support ecosystem encompassing educational, emotional, administrative, economic, and social dimensions. By integrating mentoring systems with institutional support mechanisms, the model offers both theoretical expansion and practical guidance for policy development in contexts where structural conditions significantly shape early career teaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Professional Development in Education
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2026.2727928
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grounding teacher induction in lived needs: a four-phase model for novice teachers in Iran

Sean P. Kearney, Ehsan Zarei
Professional Development in Education
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Grounding teacher induction in lived needs: a four-phase model for novice teachers in Iran

Sean P. Kearney, Ehsan Zarei
article en

Abstract

Despite extensive international research on teacher induction, models of early career support remain largely Western-centric and predominantly focused on pedagogical mentoring. In Iran, structured induction systems remain underdeveloped and insufficiently responsive to local professional realities. This paper develops a contextually grounded, multidimensional support model for novice teachers in Iran. Using a four-phase qualitative design, the research combined (1) a meta-synthesis, (2) grounded theory interviews, (3) a modified Delphi needs assessment, and (4) theory synthesis. This sequential design enabled systematic integration of global evidence with locally articulated priorities. Findings indicate that while international literature emphasises instructional mentoring and retention, novice teachers in Iran prioritise economic stability, social integration, and administrative clarity alongside pedagogical development. These priorities reveal a disconnect between pre-service preparation and workplace realities and challenge dominant induction paradigms that foreground pedagogy alone. The resulting model reconceptualises induction as a comprehensive professional support ecosystem encompassing educational, emotional, administrative, economic, and social dimensions. By integrating mentoring systems with institutional support mechanisms, the model offers both theoretical expansion and practical guidance for policy development in contexts where structural conditions significantly shape early career teaching.

Professional Development in Education
University of Hormozgan (IR), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.