SAEF: An Adaptive and Explainable Feedback System for Personalized Learning

Adaptive and explainable systems are two critical concepts in personalized learning that enhance the customized experience based on the adjusted content according to the individual learning of a learner. In this paper, we present a modular and interpretable architecture for the development of a System for Adaptive and Explainable Feedback, which is a potential solution for the above-mentioned issues in personalized learning environments. The adaptive feedback provided by the System for Adaptive and Explainable Feedback is in real time. Still, even more importantly, it is justified clearly and transparently so that both the learner and instructor understand the why behind the recommendations for action given by the system. It consists of modular technologies for data collection (word and phrase occurrence, time tracking), analysis (latency, process mining), feedback generation (adaptive after-action review), and result presentation, making a modular, flexible, and scalable system to suit many educational scenarios. To evaluate the system’s functional performance, the SAEF pipeline was applied to a dataset derived from the ASSISTments platform, a well-established educational dataset widely used in learning analytics research. On a cohort of 500 student profiles, the SAEF achieved an overall recommendation accuracy of 83.6%, a weighted F1-score of 82.9%, and a mean system response time of 42.1 ms, demonstrating both the internal computational consistency and efficiency of the adaptive pipeline. These results indicate strong agreement with score-derived difficulty categories and support the internal computational consistency of the recommendation pipeline as a proof-of-concept system, though they do not constitute independent evidence of instructional appropriateness. The SAEF is designed to support learner engagement, personalize learning pathways, and foster transparency in AI-driven educational environments; a full empirical evaluation involving real-world deployment is identified as the primary direction for future work. The perceived understandability, trustworthiness, and pedagogical usefulness of the SAEF’s explanations by learners and instructors represent a complementary dimension yet to be empirically explored. The SAEF’s architecture is designed with the explicit objective of supporting learner engagement and fostering transparency; however, these pedagogical benefits are architectural design goals rather than empirically demonstrated outcomes in the present study, which focuses exclusively on computational validation.