Implementation Outcomes of 36 CDC-funded Statewide Perinatal Quality Collaboratives, 2023-2024

CONTEXT: Maternal and infant morbidity and mortality remain high in the United States, and improving quality of clinical care is one strategy to improve outcomes. Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are statewide networks of teams working to improve maternal and infant health by supporting quality improvement (QI) initiatives. PQCs execute deliberate activities to support implementation of QI; implementation outcomes can be used to measure the execution of these activities. OBJECTIVE: To examine PQC implementation outcomes to better understand implementation achievements. DESIGN: We adapted Proctor et al.'s implementation outcomes framework to measure implementation outcomes using standardized annual PQC performance measures. SETTING: US, October 2023 through September 2024. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-supported PQCs. INTERVENTION: Developed implementation outcome definitions relevant for the standard PQC programmatic model and mapped outcomes to performance measures, assessing the execution of PQC activities. Descriptive PQC-reported data were summarized as counts and percentages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implementation outcomes (adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability). RESULTS: PQCs reported moderate adoption, with an average of 67% of births in a state occurring in birthing hospitals that participated in PQC QI initiatives. PQCs also reported moderate appropriateness; among birthing hospitals serving populations most likely to experience adverse health outcomes, 67% participated with their PQC. An average of 85% of participating birthing hospitals submitted data to their PQC as required for QI initiatives (feasibility), and PQCs averaged 75% or higher on all fidelity measures (trainings, webinars, learning products, and convenings). For penetration, fewer than 50% of PQCs engaged in activities with community-based organizations, although 56% engaged with community members and 83% with patients/families. Most (78%) participating hospitals made lasting system changes (sustainability). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that PQCs implement QI initiatives with high feasibility, fidelity, and sustainability, moderate adoption and appropriateness, and varied penetration. Understanding PQC implementation outcomes can highlight areas of success and identify areas for PQC improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002438
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Outcomes of 36 CDC-funded Statewide Perinatal Quality Collaboratives, 2023-2024

Charlan D. Kroelinger, Jacqueline Wallace, Angela M. Rohan, Allison S. Guarino
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Implementation Outcomes of 36 CDC-funded Statewide Perinatal Quality Collaboratives, 2023-2024

Charlan D. Kroelinger, Jacqueline Wallace, Angela M. Rohan, Allison S. Guarino
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: Maternal and infant morbidity and mortality remain high in the United States, and improving quality of clinical care is one strategy to improve outcomes. Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are statewide networks of teams working to improve maternal and infant health by supporting quality improvement (QI) initiatives. PQCs execute deliberate activities to support implementation of QI; implementation outcomes can be used to measure the execution of these activities. OBJECTIVE: To examine PQC implementation outcomes to better understand implementation achievements. DESIGN: We adapted Proctor et al.'s implementation outcomes framework to measure implementation outcomes using standardized annual PQC performance measures. SETTING: US, October 2023 through September 2024. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-supported PQCs. INTERVENTION: Developed implementation outcome definitions relevant for the standard PQC programmatic model and mapped outcomes to performance measures, assessing the execution of PQC activities. Descriptive PQC-reported data were summarized as counts and percentages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Implementation outcomes (adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability). RESULTS: PQCs reported moderate adoption, with an average of 67% of births in a state occurring in birthing hospitals that participated in PQC QI initiatives. PQCs also reported moderate appropriateness; among birthing hospitals serving populations most likely to experience adverse health outcomes, 67% participated with their PQC. An average of 85% of participating birthing hospitals submitted data to their PQC as required for QI initiatives (feasibility), and PQCs averaged 75% or higher on all fidelity measures (trainings, webinars, learning products, and convenings). For penetration, fewer than 50% of PQCs engaged in activities with community-based organizations, although 56% engaged with community members and 83% with patients/families. Most (78%) participating hospitals made lasting system changes (sustainability). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that PQCs implement QI initiatives with high feasibility, fidelity, and sustainability, moderate adoption and appropriateness, and varied penetration. Understanding PQC implementation outcomes can highlight areas of success and identify areas for PQC improvement.

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.