Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: Beyond dichotomies, within dilemmas

After the end of the Cold War, sociology in Central and Eastern Europe – which had existed for several decades under the conditions of the geopolitical East–West divide – found itself caught up in new divisions, dichotomies, and (self-)categorizations. This article examines the post-1989 development of sociology in the region, starting from the idea that dichotomous thinking hinders the identification of paradoxes and dilemmas in the research practices of sociologists from Central and Eastern Europe; when left unresolved, these paradoxes and dilemmas affect both the professional ethos, and the place and role of sociology beyond academia. By tracing the metamorphoses in the conceptualizations of several dichotomies (East–West, before–after 1989, national–international), we demonstrate the epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and linguistic dilemmas in which Central and Eastern European sociologists find themselves, as well as the professional choices in publishing that reproduce these dilemmas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Sociology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809261480500
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: Beyond dichotomies, within dilemmas

Svetla Koléva
International Sociology
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: Beyond dichotomies, within dilemmas

Svetla Koléva
article en

Abstract

After the end of the Cold War, sociology in Central and Eastern Europe – which had existed for several decades under the conditions of the geopolitical East–West divide – found itself caught up in new divisions, dichotomies, and (self-)categorizations. This article examines the post-1989 development of sociology in the region, starting from the idea that dichotomous thinking hinders the identification of paradoxes and dilemmas in the research practices of sociologists from Central and Eastern Europe; when left unresolved, these paradoxes and dilemmas affect both the professional ethos, and the place and role of sociology beyond academia. By tracing the metamorphoses in the conceptualizations of several dichotomies (East–West, before–after 1989, national–international), we demonstrate the epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and linguistic dilemmas in which Central and Eastern European sociologists find themselves, as well as the professional choices in publishing that reproduce these dilemmas.

International Sociology
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), Institute of Philosophy and Sociology (BG)
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: Beyond dichotomies, within dilemmas — Svetla Koléva · International Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS