Changes in COVID-19-related death certification practices and quality of cause-of-death reporting in the United States from 2020 to 2023

This study examined changes in COVID-19-related death certification practices (ie, reporting COVID-19 in Part I of the death certificate) and the quality of cause-of-death (COD) reporting (acceptable and rejected causal sequences) in the United States from 2020 to 2023. In 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, 385 293, 463 273, 246 196, and 76 024 death certificates, respectively, mentioned COVID-19. COVID-19 was selected as the underlying COD in 91%, 90%, 76%, and 65% of these certificates, corresponding to reporting COVID-19 in Part I in 93%, 91%, 78%, and 67% of certificates, respectively. Acceptable causal sequences were reported in 51%, 51%, 45%, and 41% of certificates, whereas rejected causal sequences were reported in 21%, 22%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. Using 2020 as the reference year, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for 2023 were 0.18 (0.18, 0.18) for reporting COVID-19 in Part I, 0.77 (0.76, 0.78) for reporting acceptable causal sequences, and 1.14 (1.12, 1.16) for reporting rejected causal sequences. In conclusion, COVID-19-related death certification practices changed substantially over the study period, paralleling the decline in the virulence of SARS-CoV-2. The quality of COVID-19-related COD reporting declined modestly from 2020 to 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag215
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in COVID-19-related death certification practices and quality of cause-of-death reporting in the United States from 2020 to 2023

Tsung‐Hsueh Lu, Yu‐Wen Chien, Shu‐Yu Tai, Ichiro Kawachi
American Journal of Epidemiology
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

Changes in COVID-19-related death certification practices and quality of cause-of-death reporting in the United States from 2020 to 2023

Tsung‐Hsueh Lu, Yu‐Wen Chien, Shu‐Yu Tai, Ichiro Kawachi
article en

Abstract

This study examined changes in COVID-19-related death certification practices (ie, reporting COVID-19 in Part I of the death certificate) and the quality of cause-of-death (COD) reporting (acceptable and rejected causal sequences) in the United States from 2020 to 2023. In 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, 385 293, 463 273, 246 196, and 76 024 death certificates, respectively, mentioned COVID-19. COVID-19 was selected as the underlying COD in 91%, 90%, 76%, and 65% of these certificates, corresponding to reporting COVID-19 in Part I in 93%, 91%, 78%, and 67% of certificates, respectively. Acceptable causal sequences were reported in 51%, 51%, 45%, and 41% of certificates, whereas rejected causal sequences were reported in 21%, 22%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. Using 2020 as the reference year, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for 2023 were 0.18 (0.18, 0.18) for reporting COVID-19 in Part I, 0.77 (0.76, 0.78) for reporting acceptable causal sequences, and 1.14 (1.12, 1.16) for reporting rejected causal sequences. In conclusion, COVID-19-related death certification practices changed substantially over the study period, paralleling the decline in the virulence of SARS-CoV-2. The quality of COVID-19-related COD reporting declined modestly from 2020 to 2023.

American Journal of Epidemiology
Harvard University (US), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.