Table-Based Text Parsing Methods for Polymer Science: A Comparative Study

Abstract Polymer informatics has emerged as an area of interest in the search for more sustainable plastics. Yet, there is a dearth in large, high-quality, polymer-based materials databases that are open-source for the polymer research community. Efforts to curate such databases involve autogenerating large experimental materials databases by mining chemical data from scientific literature, with a specific focus on mining tabular data as these are particularly rich sources of polymeric information. This study compares the performance of two tools in extracting large volumes of tabular data about polymer names and their glass-transition, melting and decomposition temperatures: a table-extraction tool that employs a downstream neural network to resolve polymer names from the table fields, and the table-mining part of the “chemistry-aware” natural-language-processing tool, ChemDataExtractor. We find that both methods afford high precision. The recall of the former is boosted by preserving some of the implicit structure of the source tables, while the latter offers a far wider scope of knowledge extraction from the literature on polymer science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6c05295
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Table-Based Text Parsing Methods for Polymer Science: A Comparative Study

Jacqueline M. Cole, Rian J. Howe
ACS Omega
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Table-Based Text Parsing Methods for Polymer Science: A Comparative Study

Jacqueline M. Cole, Rian J. Howe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Polymer informatics has emerged as an area of interest in the search for more sustainable plastics. Yet, there is a dearth in large, high-quality, polymer-based materials databases that are open-source for the polymer research community. Efforts to curate such databases involve autogenerating large experimental materials databases by mining chemical data from scientific literature, with a specific focus on mining tabular data as these are particularly rich sources of polymeric information. This study compares the performance of two tools in extracting large volumes of tabular data about polymer names and their glass-transition, melting and decomposition temperatures: a table-extraction tool that employs a downstream neural network to resolve polymer names from the table fields, and the table-mining part of the “chemistry-aware” natural-language-processing tool, ChemDataExtractor. We find that both methods afford high precision. The recall of the former is boosted by preserving some of the implicit structure of the source tables, while the latter offers a far wider scope of knowledge extraction from the literature on polymer science.

ACS Omega
Technicolor (France) (FR)
BASF, Royal Academy of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.