Relationships between network analysis and psychodynamic theories: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Network analysis shifts psychopathology research from latent variables to symptom interactions. While mainly cognitive-behavioral, its convergence with psychodynamic theories remains underexplored. This review maps empirical studies combining psychodynamic constructs and network models. METHODS: Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, databases (2008-2025) were searched for studies linking both approaches. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (N = 13,771 participants) identified three recurrent psychodynamic domains: personality organization, mentalization, and attachment; as central or bridge nodes within networks (mostly graphical Gaussian models). CONCLUSIONS: This tri-axial architecture supports the central role of psychodynamic concepts within psychopathology. Network analysis appears promising for operationalizing selected psychodynamic constructs and for examining their position within broader psychopathological systems, although its capacity to capture psychodynamic processes remains limited in cross-sectional designs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopathology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552525
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between network analysis and psychodynamic theories: A scoping review

Bruno Falissard, Aziz Essadek, Maud Cappelletti, Christophe Gauld et al.
Psychopathology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Relationships between network analysis and psychodynamic theories: A scoping review

Bruno Falissard, Aziz Essadek, Maud Cappelletti, Christophe Gauld, Ariane Bazan
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Network analysis shifts psychopathology research from latent variables to symptom interactions. While mainly cognitive-behavioral, its convergence with psychodynamic theories remains underexplored. This review maps empirical studies combining psychodynamic constructs and network models. METHODS: Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, databases (2008-2025) were searched for studies linking both approaches. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (N = 13,771 participants) identified three recurrent psychodynamic domains: personality organization, mentalization, and attachment; as central or bridge nodes within networks (mostly graphical Gaussian models). CONCLUSIONS: This tri-axial architecture supports the central role of psychodynamic concepts within psychopathology. Network analysis appears promising for operationalizing selected psychodynamic constructs and for examining their position within broader psychopathological systems, although its capacity to capture psychodynamic processes remains limited in cross-sectional designs.

Psychopathology
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.