The Algorithmic Mujtahid: Artificial Intelligence, Ijtihād, and the Question of Interpretive Authority in Contemporary Islamic Ethics

The rise of artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, poses a unique epistemic challenge to Islamic interpretive authority. This paper explores the notion of the “Algorithmic Mujtahid,” an AI system capable of engaging with foundational texts in ways resembling legal reasoning.Footnote1 We argue that AI forces a reconsideration of core concepts such as qasd, taqwā, and ḥikmah. By contrasting classical ijtihād's spiritual, teleological reasoning with machine learning's statistical logic, the study reveals both promise and limitation. Case studies in finance and bioethics show risks to scholarly hierarchy, concluding that AI must remain a subordinate, assistive tool rather than a replacement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theology and Science
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2026.2725297
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Algorithmic Mujtahid: Artificial Intelligence, Ijtihād, and the Question of Interpretive Authority in Contemporary Islamic Ethics

Zainab Amin
Theology and Science
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

The Algorithmic Mujtahid: Artificial Intelligence, Ijtihād, and the Question of Interpretive Authority in Contemporary Islamic Ethics

Zainab Amin
article en

Abstract

The rise of artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, poses a unique epistemic challenge to Islamic interpretive authority. This paper explores the notion of the “Algorithmic Mujtahid,” an AI system capable of engaging with foundational texts in ways resembling legal reasoning.Footnote1 We argue that AI forces a reconsideration of core concepts such as qasd, taqwā, and ḥikmah. By contrasting classical ijtihād's spiritual, teleological reasoning with machine learning's statistical logic, the study reveals both promise and limitation. Case studies in finance and bioethics show risks to scholarly hierarchy, concluding that AI must remain a subordinate, assistive tool rather than a replacement.

Theology and Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.