Analytical validation of the Mindray BC-75R Vet hematology analyzer and comparison with the Siemens Advia 2120i for application in dogs and cats

The BC-75R Vet (Mindray Animal Medical) is a multi-species hematology analyzer that uses electrical impedance and SF-Cube technology (combining laser scatter, fluorescence, and 3-dimensional analysis) for CBC and reticulocyte analysis. We evaluated its analytical performance and compared it with the Advia 2120i (Siemens), a widely used analyzer in veterinary clinical pathology. CBCs were performed on EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples from 411 dogs and 225 cats submitted for routine testing. Analytical precision, linearity, carryover, and total observed error (TE obs ) were assessed according to ASVCP guidelines. We used a 2120i as the reference method and manual differential counts for WBC evaluation. RIs were calculated from 131 healthy dogs and 53 cats. The BC-75R Vet fulfilled the ASVCP requirements for repeatability (CVs < 5% for most variables) and linearity ( r > 0.97), with negligible carryover. TE obs values were within ASVCP allowable error limits, except for WBC types in QC material, which remained acceptable for in-clinic use. Agreement with the 2120i was acceptable for most RBC-related variables; however, systematic and proportional errors were found for mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in both species, and a systematic error for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was found in dogs. Agreement for WBC and platelet counts was generally good, although discrepancies were noted for monocyte and mean platelet volume in both species. These differences likely reflect methodologic differences and known challenges in feline hematology. Despite these limitations, the BC-75R Vet met ASVCP standards and appears suitable for routine testing in dogs and cats. Manual smear review remains essential in selected cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387261473878
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical validation of the Mindray BC-75R Vet hematology analyzer and comparison with the Siemens Advia 2120i for application in dogs and cats

Francesco Lunetta, E. Martoni, Elisa Brini, Sabrina Fasoli et al.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Analytical validation of the Mindray BC-75R Vet hematology analyzer and comparison with the Siemens Advia 2120i for application in dogs and cats

Francesco Lunetta, E. Martoni, Elisa Brini, Sabrina Fasoli, Chiara Agnoli, Maria Giulia Ferrari, Francesco Dondi, M. Tumbarello, Kateryna Vasylyeva, Stefano Tropea, Martina Baldin
article en

Abstract

The BC-75R Vet (Mindray Animal Medical) is a multi-species hematology analyzer that uses electrical impedance and SF-Cube technology (combining laser scatter, fluorescence, and 3-dimensional analysis) for CBC and reticulocyte analysis. We evaluated its analytical performance and compared it with the Advia 2120i (Siemens), a widely used analyzer in veterinary clinical pathology. CBCs were performed on EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples from 411 dogs and 225 cats submitted for routine testing. Analytical precision, linearity, carryover, and total observed error (TE obs ) were assessed according to ASVCP guidelines. We used a 2120i as the reference method and manual differential counts for WBC evaluation. RIs were calculated from 131 healthy dogs and 53 cats. The BC-75R Vet fulfilled the ASVCP requirements for repeatability (CVs < 5% for most variables) and linearity ( r > 0.97), with negligible carryover. TE obs values were within ASVCP allowable error limits, except for WBC types in QC material, which remained acceptable for in-clinic use. Agreement with the 2120i was acceptable for most RBC-related variables; however, systematic and proportional errors were found for mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in both species, and a systematic error for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was found in dogs. Agreement for WBC and platelet counts was generally good, although discrepancies were noted for monocyte and mean platelet volume in both species. These differences likely reflect methodologic differences and known challenges in feline hematology. Despite these limitations, the BC-75R Vet met ASVCP standards and appears suitable for routine testing in dogs and cats. Manual smear review remains essential in selected cases.

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
University of Padua (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.