Visceral states and social transmission bias: A social psychological perspective on financial decision-making

Financial decisions are shaped by the body as much as by the mind. This paper links transient visceral states, such as hunger, thirst, fatigue, and pain, to the influence of socially transmitted signals. Existing work treats these as independent influences. We argue that they interact. By degrading the capacity for independent evaluation, visceral states raise reliance on the evaluations of others. Drawing on constructionist accounts of emotion, social decision neuroscience, and dual-process models, we explain why this amplification is specific to social cues rather than to salient cues in general. Five propositions follow, each with a discriminating prediction. Mindfulness and self-regulation enter as tests of the mechanism, not as remedies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107752
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visceral states and social transmission bias: A social psychological perspective on financial decision-making

Aariz Faizan Javed, Harsimran Sandhu, Sachin Choudhry, Hardeep Singh Mundi et al.
Acta Psychologica
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Visceral states and social transmission bias: A social psychological perspective on financial decision-making

Aariz Faizan Javed, Harsimran Sandhu, Sachin Choudhry, Hardeep Singh Mundi, Shreya
article en

Abstract

Financial decisions are shaped by the body as much as by the mind. This paper links transient visceral states, such as hunger, thirst, fatigue, and pain, to the influence of socially transmitted signals. Existing work treats these as independent influences. We argue that they interact. By degrading the capacity for independent evaluation, visceral states raise reliance on the evaluations of others. Drawing on constructionist accounts of emotion, social decision neuroscience, and dual-process models, we explain why this amplification is specific to social cues rather than to salient cues in general. Five propositions follow, each with a discriminating prediction. Mindfulness and self-regulation enter as tests of the mechanism, not as remedies.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 270
Institute of Management Technology (IN), Synergy University Dubai (AE), Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.