Effectiveness of application–based mobile health in reducing acute exacerbations among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is increasingly supported by application-based mobile health (mHealth) interventions. However, their effects on acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD)-related hospitalization and other health outcomes remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of application-based mHealth interventions in people with COPD. This review followed the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Ultimate, CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with COPD were included if the intervention was delivered through a mobile-device application and compared with usual care without application-based mHealth support. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Eighteen studies reported in 19 publications were included. Application-based mHealth interventions did not significantly reduce the number of participants with AECOPD-related hospitalization (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.20) or improve quality of life measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (MD = − 0.08; 95% CI = − 0.51 to 0.35) or St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (MD = − 2.90; 95% CI = − 7.24 to 1.43). In contrast, these interventions improved functional exercise capacity, as reflected by increased 6-minute walk distance (MD = 32.20 m; 95% CI = 13.44 to 50.96). Studies assessing psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale reported no significant between-group differences. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. Current evidence does not clearly support application-based mHealth as an effective strategy for reducing AECOPD-related hospitalization or improving quality of life in people with COPD. However, it may have potential for improving functional exercise capacity. Future trials should more clearly define application functions, intervention frameworks, and target populations to determine when, for whom, and through which mechanisms application-based mHealth can improve clinically meaningful outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04685-2
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of application–based mobile health in reducing acute exacerbations among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tomoko Kamei, Qi Lin, Xinxia Shao
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effectiveness of application–based mobile health in reducing acute exacerbations among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tomoko Kamei, Qi Lin, Xinxia Shao
article en

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is increasingly supported by application-based mobile health (mHealth) interventions. However, their effects on acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD)-related hospitalization and other health outcomes remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of application-based mHealth interventions in people with COPD. This review followed the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Ultimate, CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with COPD were included if the intervention was delivered through a mobile-device application and compared with usual care without application-based mHealth support. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Eighteen studies reported in 19 publications were included. Application-based mHealth interventions did not significantly reduce the number of participants with AECOPD-related hospitalization (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.20) or improve quality of life measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (MD = − 0.08; 95% CI = − 0.51 to 0.35) or St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (MD = − 2.90; 95% CI = − 7.24 to 1.43). In contrast, these interventions improved functional exercise capacity, as reflected by increased 6-minute walk distance (MD = 32.20 m; 95% CI = 13.44 to 50.96). Studies assessing psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale reported no significant between-group differences. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. Current evidence does not clearly support application-based mHealth as an effective strategy for reducing AECOPD-related hospitalization or improving quality of life in people with COPD. However, it may have potential for improving functional exercise capacity. Future trials should more clearly define application functions, intervention frameworks, and target populations to determine when, for whom, and through which mechanisms application-based mHealth can improve clinically meaningful outcomes.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine
St. Luke's International University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.