Sociology in China: Diversification within bounds, indigenization without decolonization

This article aims to offer a critical overview of sociology in mainland China from its late 19th-century origins to the present. By blending historical contextualization with content analysis, I chart the distinctive trajectory of Chinese sociology with reference to predominant influences from the state and American sponsorship. While witnessing a diversification of research topics, indigenization has been central to Chinese sociology ever since its inception. The recent controversy over indigenization as a “pseudo-problem” is underpinned by the broader relationship of Chinese sociologists with the state. Concomitantly, decolonial scholarship has been largely absent in Chinese sociology. Instead of epistemic critique, Chinese sociologists mostly pursue indigenization as a mean to “catch up” with the West or valorize traditional culture. After noting the dominance of professional over public sociology, I conclude by outlining some opportunities and challenges facing Chinese sociology, which revolve around its hierarchical structures at the institutional, regional, and gender levels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Sociology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809261483442
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociology in China: Diversification within bounds, indigenization without decolonization

Hon Fai Chen
International Sociology
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

Sociology in China: Diversification within bounds, indigenization without decolonization

Hon Fai Chen
article en

Abstract

This article aims to offer a critical overview of sociology in mainland China from its late 19th-century origins to the present. By blending historical contextualization with content analysis, I chart the distinctive trajectory of Chinese sociology with reference to predominant influences from the state and American sponsorship. While witnessing a diversification of research topics, indigenization has been central to Chinese sociology ever since its inception. The recent controversy over indigenization as a “pseudo-problem” is underpinned by the broader relationship of Chinese sociologists with the state. Concomitantly, decolonial scholarship has been largely absent in Chinese sociology. Instead of epistemic critique, Chinese sociologists mostly pursue indigenization as a mean to “catch up” with the West or valorize traditional culture. After noting the dominance of professional over public sociology, I conclude by outlining some opportunities and challenges facing Chinese sociology, which revolve around its hierarchical structures at the institutional, regional, and gender levels.

International Sociology
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.