Preferences for Neurotization of Functioning Free Muscle Transplantation in Long-Standing Facial Paralysis – Global Insights from 107 Experts

BACKGROUND: Dynamic reanimation with functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) is the standard of care for long-standing and developmental facial paralysis. Donor nerve selection is pivotal, but no consensus exists on preferred strategies. METHODS: An international, web-based survey was distributed to attending microsurgeons performing FFMT for long-standing facial paralysis. The questionnaire collected demographic data and preferences across ten standardized clinical scenarios. Descriptive statistics summarized responses. RESULTS: A total of 107 experts from 34 countries responded. The gracilis was the preferred donor muscle (92.5%). Donor nerve choice varied with age: for patients <60 years, cross-facial nerve grafts (CFNG) were most common (44.9%), whereas for patients ≥60 years, the masseteric nerve predominated (60.7%). Dual innervation was used by 17-20% of respondents, though optimal configuration varied. In bilateral congenital paralysis, 91.6% favored the masseteric nerve, while unilateral developmental cases showed more evenly distributed preferences among CFNG (35.5%), masseteric (34.6%), and dual innervation (26.2%). Surgeons prioritized either maximal excursion (42.1%) or spontaneous smile (39.3%). Reported CFNG limitations included limited excursion, insufficient axons, and the need for a two-stage procedure. Adjunctive strategies included sensory supercharging (21.5%), electrical stimulation (14.0%), and vascularized nerve grafts (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This global survey highlights current preferences in donor nerve selection for FFMT. CFNG is favored in younger patients for spontaneity, while the masseteric nerve is preferred in older individuals for reliability. Dual innervation is increasingly adopted but heterogeneous. These findings underscore the need for comparative outcome studies and consensus-building in free functioning muscle transplantation for facial reanimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013439
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences for Neurotization of Functioning Free Muscle Transplantation in Long-Standing Facial Paralysis – Global Insights from 107 Experts

Olivier Camuzard, Abraham Zavala, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

Preferences for Neurotization of Functioning Free Muscle Transplantation in Long-Standing Facial Paralysis – Global Insights from 107 Experts

Olivier Camuzard, Abraham Zavala, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Yoshie Imai
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic reanimation with functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) is the standard of care for long-standing and developmental facial paralysis. Donor nerve selection is pivotal, but no consensus exists on preferred strategies. METHODS: An international, web-based survey was distributed to attending microsurgeons performing FFMT for long-standing facial paralysis. The questionnaire collected demographic data and preferences across ten standardized clinical scenarios. Descriptive statistics summarized responses. RESULTS: A total of 107 experts from 34 countries responded. The gracilis was the preferred donor muscle (92.5%). Donor nerve choice varied with age: for patients <60 years, cross-facial nerve grafts (CFNG) were most common (44.9%), whereas for patients ≥60 years, the masseteric nerve predominated (60.7%). Dual innervation was used by 17-20% of respondents, though optimal configuration varied. In bilateral congenital paralysis, 91.6% favored the masseteric nerve, while unilateral developmental cases showed more evenly distributed preferences among CFNG (35.5%), masseteric (34.6%), and dual innervation (26.2%). Surgeons prioritized either maximal excursion (42.1%) or spontaneous smile (39.3%). Reported CFNG limitations included limited excursion, insufficient axons, and the need for a two-stage procedure. Adjunctive strategies included sensory supercharging (21.5%), electrical stimulation (14.0%), and vascularized nerve grafts (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This global survey highlights current preferences in donor nerve selection for FFMT. CFNG is favored in younger patients for spontaneity, while the masseteric nerve is preferred in older individuals for reliability. Dual innervation is increasingly adopted but heterogeneous. These findings underscore the need for comparative outcome studies and consensus-building in free functioning muscle transplantation for facial reanimation.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Chang Gung University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (PE), Hôpital Pasteur (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.