Electric vehicle adoption and transport-sector CO₂ emissions

This study examines whether electric-vehicle (EV) adoption is associated with lower transport-sector carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions using a balanced panel of 31 countries observed annually from 2010 to 2022. Because EV adoption most directly affects road transport rather than economy-wide emissions, transport-sector CO₂ is used as the primary channel-aligned outcome, with oil-related and total CO₂ providing complementary mechanism and comparison tests. We estimate two-way country and year fixed-effects models and evaluate the robustness of the association using second-period-lag and Bartik battery-metal shift-share instrumental variables, alternative specifications and diagnostics, falsification tests, and a staggered difference-in-differences design around major EV-policy adoption. A 1% increase in new-EV sales is associated with a 0.058% reduction in transport-sector CO₂ and a 0.041% reduction in oil-related CO₂; the corresponding lag-IV (−0.062) and Bartik-IV (−0.071) estimates are similar in magnitude. The transport-sector association is stronger than the corresponding association with total CO₂, consistent with concentration of the relationship in the sector through which EV substitution should operate. The estimated reduction is also stronger when contemporaneous internal-combustion-engine sales are high and in countries with cleaner electricity grids, with a smaller additional amplification observed among high-income countries. EV sales are additionally associated with lower transport-sector CO₂ per unit of GDP, although this estimate is only marginally significant. The difference-in-differences estimate is −0.072 for the full panel and −0.128 among early-adopting cohorts; the association is concentrated among early adopters and strengthens with time since policy adoption. Results remain broadly stable across alternative specifications, while sectoral placebo and pre-EV-period negative-control tests are broadly supportive of the proposed interpretation. Collectively, the convergence of channel-aligned outcomes, fixed-effects, instrumental-variable, heterogeneity, and policy-timing analyses provides robust evidence that greater EV adoption is associated with lower transport-sector emissions, while the observational design does not establish that EV adoption alone caused the observed reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High School Science
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64336/001c.169606
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Electric vehicle adoption and transport-sector CO₂ emissions

Katie Kim, Bryan Kyung
Journal of High School Science
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Electric vehicle adoption and transport-sector CO₂ emissions

Katie Kim, Bryan Kyung
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether electric-vehicle (EV) adoption is associated with lower transport-sector carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions using a balanced panel of 31 countries observed annually from 2010 to 2022. Because EV adoption most directly affects road transport rather than economy-wide emissions, transport-sector CO₂ is used as the primary channel-aligned outcome, with oil-related and total CO₂ providing complementary mechanism and comparison tests. We estimate two-way country and year fixed-effects models and evaluate the robustness of the association using second-period-lag and Bartik battery-metal shift-share instrumental variables, alternative specifications and diagnostics, falsification tests, and a staggered difference-in-differences design around major EV-policy adoption. A 1% increase in new-EV sales is associated with a 0.058% reduction in transport-sector CO₂ and a 0.041% reduction in oil-related CO₂; the corresponding lag-IV (−0.062) and Bartik-IV (−0.071) estimates are similar in magnitude. The transport-sector association is stronger than the corresponding association with total CO₂, consistent with concentration of the relationship in the sector through which EV substitution should operate. The estimated reduction is also stronger when contemporaneous internal-combustion-engine sales are high and in countries with cleaner electricity grids, with a smaller additional amplification observed among high-income countries. EV sales are additionally associated with lower transport-sector CO₂ per unit of GDP, although this estimate is only marginally significant. The difference-in-differences estimate is −0.072 for the full panel and −0.128 among early-adopting cohorts; the association is concentrated among early adopters and strengthens with time since policy adoption. Results remain broadly stable across alternative specifications, while sectoral placebo and pre-EV-period negative-control tests are broadly supportive of the proposed interpretation. Collectively, the convergence of channel-aligned outcomes, fixed-effects, instrumental-variable, heterogeneity, and policy-timing analyses provides robust evidence that greater EV adoption is associated with lower transport-sector emissions, while the observational design does not establish that EV adoption alone caused the observed reductions.

Journal of High School ScienceVol. 10(3)
Grammar School (SK), La Jolla Infectious Disease Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.