Microsatellites Versus Genome-Wide SNPs Data for Pedigree Reconstruction in Twin Simmental Crossbred Cattle

Accurate pedigree reconstruction is critical for genetic evaluation in admixed cattle populations, yet the relative performance of microsatellite and genome-wide SNP markers in twin-rich herds with incomplete pedigree records remains unclear. We compared 12 ISAG-recommended microsatellite markers with whole-genome SNP data for dam–calf assignment in a Simmental crossbred population (n = 43, 13 dam–calf groups) from southern China. Twin zygosity was determined from SNP identity-by-descent (PI_HAT) values: nine calf pairs were dizygotic, one pair was monozygotic (20A/21A), and one adult pair was composed of dizygotic twin sisters (31A/34A). Admixture analysis at K = 3 revealed ancestry proportions of 50.7% European taurine, 28.9% Chinese indicine and 20.4% East Asian taurine. The SNP-based neighbor-joining tree correctly recovered 12 of 13 groups (92.3%, 95% CI: 64.0–99.8%), whereas the microsatellite-based tree recovered 11 (84.6%, 95% CI: 54.6–98.1%); the difference was not statistically significant (exact McNemar test, p = 1.0). Locus INRA023 was monomorphic (PIC = 0), reducing the effective number of markers to 11. These results indicate that genome-wide SNPs show a favourable trend in accuracy and are less prone to false-positive clustering than a standard microsatellite panel in admixed, twin-rich cattle populations.