Hydrodynamic Performance and Bucket-Controlled Turning Optimization of an Amphibious Rescue and Operation Platform with Detachable Floating Boxes

This study investigates the hydrodynamic behavior of an amphibious rescue and operation platform equipped with detachable floating boxes and a front bucket system, and it further develops a control-oriented turning optimization framework for a two-bucket steering configuration. Calm-water resistance, free-surface evolution, running attitude, and roll decay were analyzed using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/volume-of-fluid solver with overset grids and dynamic fluid–body interaction. Straight-ahead non-rotating cases were computed using a symmetry-based half-domain model, whereas roll- and turning-related cases were simulated in the full domain. The numerical method was validated against towing-tank data for a benchmark amphibious vehicle, and the predicted resistance showed an overall deviation of 2.11%. The results show that the detachable floating boxes slightly increase resistance at 2 km/h, but reduce resistance by approximately 11.4% at 8 km/h owing to favorable wave interference. They also reduce trim and heave over the investigated speed range and markedly improve transverse stability, with the roll motion decaying to nearly zero within about 20 s. By contrast, the installation of the bucket substantially increases hydrodynamic resistance; at the design cruising speed of 8 km/h, the resistance increase reaches about 74.4%, while a bucket-induced bow-down moment modifies the running attitude and suppresses heave. At cruising speed, the bucket swing-arm angle has a non-monotonic influence: the resistance reaches a local peak near 6°, the minimum resistance is obtained at 20°, and the smallest trim is achieved at 4°. Based on these findings, a symmetry-preserving hydrodynamic surrogate and a constrained optimization strategy were established for bucket-controlled turning-radius allocation. The results indicate that differential bucket motion is the primary steering mechanism, whereas the bucket-arm angle provides secondary steering amplification at the cost of additional drag. The present study provides an integrated hydrodynamic basis for the design, operation, and steering-oriented control allocation of amphibious rescue platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14171647
Primary Topic
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Hydrodynamic Performance and Bucket-Controlled Turning Optimization of an Amphibious Rescue and Operation Platform with Detachable Floating Boxes

Bolong Liu, Junjie Li, Xiaojun Xu, Yaxin Xie
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
article

Hydrodynamic Performance and Bucket-Controlled Turning Optimization of an Amphibious Rescue and Operation Platform with Detachable Floating Boxes

Bolong Liu, Junjie Li, Xiaojun Xu, Yaxin Xie
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the hydrodynamic behavior of an amphibious rescue and operation platform equipped with detachable floating boxes and a front bucket system, and it further develops a control-oriented turning optimization framework for a two-bucket steering configuration. Calm-water resistance, free-surface evolution, running attitude, and roll decay were analyzed using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/volume-of-fluid solver with overset grids and dynamic fluid–body interaction. Straight-ahead non-rotating cases were computed using a symmetry-based half-domain model, whereas roll- and turning-related cases were simulated in the full domain. The numerical method was validated against towing-tank data for a benchmark amphibious vehicle, and the predicted resistance showed an overall deviation of 2.11%. The results show that the detachable floating boxes slightly increase resistance at 2 km/h, but reduce resistance by approximately 11.4% at 8 km/h owing to favorable wave interference. They also reduce trim and heave over the investigated speed range and markedly improve transverse stability, with the roll motion decaying to nearly zero within about 20 s. By contrast, the installation of the bucket substantially increases hydrodynamic resistance; at the design cruising speed of 8 km/h, the resistance increase reaches about 74.4%, while a bucket-induced bow-down moment modifies the running attitude and suppresses heave. At cruising speed, the bucket swing-arm angle has a non-monotonic influence: the resistance reaches a local peak near 6°, the minimum resistance is obtained at 20°, and the smallest trim is achieved at 4°. Based on these findings, a symmetry-preserving hydrodynamic surrogate and a constrained optimization strategy were established for bucket-controlled turning-radius allocation. The results indicate that differential bucket motion is the primary steering mechanism, whereas the bucket-arm angle provides secondary steering amplification at the cost of additional drag. The present study provides an integrated hydrodynamic basis for the design, operation, and steering-oriented control allocation of amphibious rescue platforms.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(17)
National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.