Does the Gravitational Field Follow the Quantum State or Its Expectation Value? A Tunable-Probability Page-Geilker Experiment

Matter-wave interferometry has confirmed the superposition principle for objects as large as fullerenes and, most recently, nanoparticles of thousands of atoms. Because every massive object sources a gravitational field, a long-standing question follows: does the gravitational field of a delocalized quantum system track the realized quantum state, or the probability-weighted expectation value of its mass distribution (semiclassical gravity)? We first revisit a distant-observer thought experiment in which gravitational which-path information appears to threaten complementarity, and summarize its modern resolution, which turns the apparent paradox into an argument for the quantization of the gravitational field. We then propose a variant of the 1981 Page–Geilker experiment that generalizes a protocol of Kent: the position of a macroscopic source mass is controlled by a quantum random trigger whose firing probability p is continuously tunable, a precision gravimeter monitors the local field, and an otherwise identical run with a classical pseudo-random trigger serves as a control. For no-collapse semiclassical gravity we derive, for a repeated protocol with reset, the field offset in intervals without a release and the suppression of the gravimeter step at quantum-triggered releases; both depend on p, whereas every event-sourced theory predicts a p-independent, event-following field, and the control run cancels systematics that scale with the release rate. Order-of-magnitude estimates indicate that a superconducting gravimeter and a 100–1000 kg source can bound the fraction of “counterfactual” mass that gravitates at the 10−3 level as a function of p. We state which hypotheses the experiment can falsify, why decoherence restricts its scope to no-collapse semiclassical theories, and how the design could be migrated to mesoscopic masses, where the question remains open. Version 2 (September 2026) of a manuscript first written in June 2026. 10 pages, 1 table, 44 references. Also submitted to arXiv (quant-ph, cross-list gr-qc).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22301648
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Does the Gravitational Field Follow the Quantum State or Its Expectation Value? A Tunable-Probability Page-Geilker Experiment

Koorosh Karimi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Does the Gravitational Field Follow the Quantum State or Its Expectation Value? A Tunable-Probability Page-Geilker Experiment

Koorosh Karimi
preprint en

Abstract

Matter-wave interferometry has confirmed the superposition principle for objects as large as fullerenes and, most recently, nanoparticles of thousands of atoms. Because every massive object sources a gravitational field, a long-standing question follows: does the gravitational field of a delocalized quantum system track the realized quantum state, or the probability-weighted expectation value of its mass distribution (semiclassical gravity)? We first revisit a distant-observer thought experiment in which gravitational which-path information appears to threaten complementarity, and summarize its modern resolution, which turns the apparent paradox into an argument for the quantization of the gravitational field. We then propose a variant of the 1981 Page–Geilker experiment that generalizes a protocol of Kent: the position of a macroscopic source mass is controlled by a quantum random trigger whose firing probability p is continuously tunable, a precision gravimeter monitors the local field, and an otherwise identical run with a classical pseudo-random trigger serves as a control. For no-collapse semiclassical gravity we derive, for a repeated protocol with reset, the field offset in intervals without a release and the suppression of the gravimeter step at quantum-triggered releases; both depend on p, whereas every event-sourced theory predicts a p-independent, event-following field, and the control run cancels systematics that scale with the release rate. Order-of-magnitude estimates indicate that a superconducting gravimeter and a 100–1000 kg source can bound the fraction of “counterfactual” mass that gravitates at the 10−3 level as a function of p. We state which hypotheses the experiment can falsify, why decoherence restricts its scope to no-collapse semiclassical theories, and how the design could be migrated to mesoscopic masses, where the question remains open. Version 2 (September 2026) of a manuscript first written in June 2026. 10 pages, 1 table, 44 references. Also submitted to arXiv (quant-ph, cross-list gr-qc).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does the Gravitational Field Follow the Quantum State or Its Expectation Value? A Tunable-Probability Page-Geilker Experiment — Koorosh Karimi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS