Reassessing Confidentiality Versus Transparency in International Investment Arbitration: A Comparative Critical Review

Abstract Due to the emphasis placed on implementing confidentiality in arbitration, arbitration has become an important tool for settling international trade and investment disputes. Confidentiality constitutes a procedural guarantee for litigants without which arbitration cannot be envisaged. This is despite the demands to apply transparency to some issues related to international investment arbitration. To achieve its objectives, the study was divided into sections that dealt with the nature of confidentiality in commercial arbitration, the subjective and objective rationalizations that compelled arbitrators to staunchly adhere to the principle of confidentiality, and the issues that made the principle of confidentiality an impediment to international investment arbitration which generated serious calls to implement the principle of transparency. The study also defines the concept of confidentiality by distinguishing it from privacy, as misunderstandings surrounding the nature of these two concepts have confused confidentiality mechanisms. A further emerging trend that runs counter to the dominant idea of absolute confidentiality in arbitration resulted from the continuous international demand to give transparency a prominent role over confidentiality in investment arbitration. This trend also calls for a clear arbitration process that allows the public to participate in access the investment arbitration proceedings and assess their legitimacy and transparency. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law has initiated a “paradigm shift” in arbitral proceedings by passing rules regulating the transparency of investment arbitration work: the “UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration” adopted in 2014. In this context, this study seeks to analyse the principle of transparency and balance it with the principle of confidentiality of international investment arbitration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0055
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing Confidentiality Versus Transparency in International Investment Arbitration: A Comparative Critical Review

Ahmad Farah, Nagham Al-Otaibi
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Reassessing Confidentiality Versus Transparency in International Investment Arbitration: A Comparative Critical Review

Ahmad Farah, Nagham Al-Otaibi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Due to the emphasis placed on implementing confidentiality in arbitration, arbitration has become an important tool for settling international trade and investment disputes. Confidentiality constitutes a procedural guarantee for litigants without which arbitration cannot be envisaged. This is despite the demands to apply transparency to some issues related to international investment arbitration. To achieve its objectives, the study was divided into sections that dealt with the nature of confidentiality in commercial arbitration, the subjective and objective rationalizations that compelled arbitrators to staunchly adhere to the principle of confidentiality, and the issues that made the principle of confidentiality an impediment to international investment arbitration which generated serious calls to implement the principle of transparency. The study also defines the concept of confidentiality by distinguishing it from privacy, as misunderstandings surrounding the nature of these two concepts have confused confidentiality mechanisms. A further emerging trend that runs counter to the dominant idea of absolute confidentiality in arbitration resulted from the continuous international demand to give transparency a prominent role over confidentiality in investment arbitration. This trend also calls for a clear arbitration process that allows the public to participate in access the investment arbitration proceedings and assess their legitimacy and transparency. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law has initiated a “paradigm shift” in arbitral proceedings by passing rules regulating the transparency of investment arbitration work: the “UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration” adopted in 2014. In this context, this study seeks to analyse the principle of transparency and balance it with the principle of confidentiality of international investment arbitration.

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
University of Sharjah (AE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.