Utilisation of expert-led multidisciplinary team discussions in improving the knowledge and confidence of gastroenterologists’ management of upper gastrointestinal bleeds within a formalised haemostasis course

Objective Repeated surveys have demonstrated that senior gastroenterology trainees lack confidence and experience in managing acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeds. Whilst no current formalised sign-off exists, this is an area of interest and development among stakeholders. We developed a course to address this gap in training and our aim was to evaluate its impact on delegate knowledge and perceived confidence. Method A 1-day course was developed comprising case-based discussions and small group hands-on training stations. A variety of complex real-life bleed cases were discussed through interactive expert-guided discussion. Delegates completed a pre-course and post-course multiple choice assessment using haemostasis scenarios. The primary outcome was to assess both confidence and knowledge before and after our intervention. Secondary outcomes included perceived acceptability, benefit of case-based multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions and effectiveness of hands-on stations. Results A total of 58 delegates took part across two cycles of the course a year apart. The median knowledge score for the pre-course quiz was 58.33% (CI=3.45), rising to 75% (CI=4.33) post-course (p<0.05). The median confidence score prior to the course was 6.42/10, rising to 8.58/10 after (p<0.05). All delegates felt the course met their requirements. The perceived effectiveness of MDT discussions was 4.87/5, and all hands-on stations received positive feedback, averaging 4.62/5. Conclusions Our educational intervention proved beneficial in increasing delegates’ confidence and knowledge in managing UGI bleeds. We believe that a UGI haemostasis course could be embedded in training programmes to improve UGI bleeding management competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Gastroenterology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2026-103749
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilisation of expert-led multidisciplinary team discussions in improving the knowledge and confidence of gastroenterologists’ management of upper gastrointestinal bleeds within a formalised haemostasis course

Stephanie Poo, Anthony Leahy, Sabina Beg, Mark Fullard et al.
Frontline Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Utilisation of expert-led multidisciplinary team discussions in improving the knowledge and confidence of gastroenterologists’ management of upper gastrointestinal bleeds within a formalised haemostasis course

Stephanie Poo, Anthony Leahy, Sabina Beg, Mark Fullard, Meha Bhuva, James Evans, Dylan Angel, Paul Martin Trembling
article en

Abstract

Objective Repeated surveys have demonstrated that senior gastroenterology trainees lack confidence and experience in managing acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeds. Whilst no current formalised sign-off exists, this is an area of interest and development among stakeholders. We developed a course to address this gap in training and our aim was to evaluate its impact on delegate knowledge and perceived confidence. Method A 1-day course was developed comprising case-based discussions and small group hands-on training stations. A variety of complex real-life bleed cases were discussed through interactive expert-guided discussion. Delegates completed a pre-course and post-course multiple choice assessment using haemostasis scenarios. The primary outcome was to assess both confidence and knowledge before and after our intervention. Secondary outcomes included perceived acceptability, benefit of case-based multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions and effectiveness of hands-on stations. Results A total of 58 delegates took part across two cycles of the course a year apart. The median knowledge score for the pre-course quiz was 58.33% (CI=3.45), rising to 75% (CI=4.33) post-course (p<0.05). The median confidence score prior to the course was 6.42/10, rising to 8.58/10 after (p<0.05). All delegates felt the course met their requirements. The perceived effectiveness of MDT discussions was 4.87/5, and all hands-on stations received positive feedback, averaging 4.62/5. Conclusions Our educational intervention proved beneficial in increasing delegates’ confidence and knowledge in managing UGI bleeds. We believe that a UGI haemostasis course could be embedded in training programmes to improve UGI bleeding management competence.

Frontline Gastroenterology
Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.