Estimating the Internal Rate of Return of the Influential Jamaica Early Childhood Intervention

Abstract This article quantifies the economic benefits of an influential early childhood program in a developing country, tracking participants with outcomes measured through age 31 years. Drawing on published experimental data encompassing life-cycle benefits – that rely primarily on available labor-market outcomes – alongside a rigorous cost analysis, we estimate an internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.4–10.7% and benefit–cost ratio of ~8. Even though estimates are not that precise, a variety of sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of these findings. Notably, we find meaningful gender heterogeneity in returns: females exhibit a higher IRR of 11.5%, compared to their male counterparts (9.6%), suggesting that – in developing countries – early childhood programs may generate disproportionately larger economic gains for women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2026.10055
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Estimating the Internal Rate of Return of the Influential Jamaica Early Childhood Intervention

Florencia López Bóo, Nicolás García Balus
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Estimating the Internal Rate of Return of the Influential Jamaica Early Childhood Intervention

Florencia López Bóo, Nicolás García Balus
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article quantifies the economic benefits of an influential early childhood program in a developing country, tracking participants with outcomes measured through age 31 years. Drawing on published experimental data encompassing life-cycle benefits – that rely primarily on available labor-market outcomes – alongside a rigorous cost analysis, we estimate an internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.4–10.7% and benefit–cost ratio of ~8. Even though estimates are not that precise, a variety of sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of these findings. Notably, we find meaningful gender heterogeneity in returns: females exhibit a higher IRR of 11.5%, compared to their male counterparts (9.6%), suggesting that – in developing countries – early childhood programs may generate disproportionately larger economic gains for women.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Inter-American Development Bank (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.