Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing to Enhance Evidence for New Therapies

Estimating and interpreting treatment effects (TE) for rare or delayed clinical outcomes is often challenging. To address this, researchers may incorporate additional evidence sources, including historical trial data and concurrent information from intermediate outcomes. In this article, we present Bayesian dynamic borrowing (BDB) as a principled framework for integrating such data while maintaining control of bias and Type I error. Using hypothetical trials of a novel high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis, we provide a step-by-step demonstration of how BDB can be used to combine an imprecise TE estimate for a final outcome with a prediction derived from historical data and information on a concurrent intermediate outcome. Our illustration includes calibration of BDB to meet desired Type I error and power properties, and sensitivity analyses to assess robustness to assumption violations. We also discuss key considerations for applying BDB in regulatory decision making and health technology assessment contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PharmacoEconomics
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-026-01656-7
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing to Enhance Evidence for New Therapies

Keith R. Abrams, Sean Yiu, Katya Galactionova, Mark Sculpher et al.
PharmacoEconomics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing to Enhance Evidence for New Therapies

Keith R. Abrams, Sean Yiu, Katya Galactionova, Mark Sculpher, Maarten Postma, Chris Skedgel, Steven Yuen, Isabelle Durand Zaleski
article en

Abstract

Estimating and interpreting treatment effects (TE) for rare or delayed clinical outcomes is often challenging. To address this, researchers may incorporate additional evidence sources, including historical trial data and concurrent information from intermediate outcomes. In this article, we present Bayesian dynamic borrowing (BDB) as a principled framework for integrating such data while maintaining control of bias and Type I error. Using hypothetical trials of a novel high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis, we provide a step-by-step demonstration of how BDB can be used to combine an imprecise TE estimate for a final outcome with a prediction derived from historical data and information on a concurrent intermediate outcome. Our illustration includes calibration of BDB to meet desired Type I error and power properties, and sensitivity analyses to assess robustness to assumption violations. We also discuss key considerations for applying BDB in regulatory decision making and health technology assessment contexts.

PharmacoEconomics
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Inserm (FR), University of Groningen (NL), University of Warwick (GB), Office Of Health Economics (GB), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Astellas Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB), Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (FR), Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) (NL), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique (FR), University of York (GB)
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.