Broad-pedicle posterior tibial artery perforator-plus and sural neurocutaneous flaps as two distally based options for moderate-sized distal lower-leg and ankle defects: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Moderate-sized distal lower-leg and ankle defects can be reconstructed with local flaps when adjacent donor tissue and vascular territories remain intact. We assessed two anatomy-selected, non-interchangeable options: a broad-pedicle posterior tibial artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap and a distally based sural neurocutaneous flap. Methods This retrospective cohort included 40 adults treated from January 2019 to January 2024 (20 per group). Allocation was anatomy guided rather than randomized. The primary outcome was complete flap survival; secondary outcomes included necrosis, venous congestion, other complications, revision surgery, operative time, protective sensation, ankle motion, ambulation, and follow-up. Welch t tests, Fisher exact tests, and a Pearson chi-square test were used; effect estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Defect location differed between groups ( P = 0.002). Complete survival occurred in 19/20 posterior tibial flaps (95%) and 15/20 sural flaps (75%) (risk difference, 20.0% points; 95% CI, -3.2 to 42.3; P = 0.182). Venous congestion occurred in 1/20 (5%) and 7/20 (35%), respectively (risk difference, -30.0% points; 95% CI, -52.1 to -4.9; P = 0.044). Operative time was shorter in the posterior tibial group (mean difference, -18.4 min; 95% CI, -26.3 to -10.5; P < 0.001). Functional findings were exploratory because standardized preoperative baselines were unavailable. Conclusions Anatomy-guided allocation introduced selection bias and limits direct comparison and causal inference. The findings support individualized, territory-based reconstruction rather than a hierarchy of superiority. The posterior tibial perforator-plus option may suit medial defects requiring limited-arc transfer, whereas the sural flap remains useful for posterolateral, lateral-malleolar, heel, and Achilles-region defects when its distal perforator territory and venous pathway are intact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-04175-6
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Broad-pedicle posterior tibial artery perforator-plus and sural neurocutaneous flaps as two distally based options for moderate-sized distal lower-leg and ankle defects: a retrospective cohort study

Xinhui Du, Mingju Gao, Zeming Lang, Zhiqiang Zhao et al.
BMC Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Broad-pedicle posterior tibial artery perforator-plus and sural neurocutaneous flaps as two distally based options for moderate-sized distal lower-leg and ankle defects: a retrospective cohort study

Xinhui Du, Mingju Gao, Zeming Lang, Zhiqiang Zhao, Hui Shao, Kai Yang, Yuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Moderate-sized distal lower-leg and ankle defects can be reconstructed with local flaps when adjacent donor tissue and vascular territories remain intact. We assessed two anatomy-selected, non-interchangeable options: a broad-pedicle posterior tibial artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap and a distally based sural neurocutaneous flap. Methods This retrospective cohort included 40 adults treated from January 2019 to January 2024 (20 per group). Allocation was anatomy guided rather than randomized. The primary outcome was complete flap survival; secondary outcomes included necrosis, venous congestion, other complications, revision surgery, operative time, protective sensation, ankle motion, ambulation, and follow-up. Welch t tests, Fisher exact tests, and a Pearson chi-square test were used; effect estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Defect location differed between groups ( P = 0.002). Complete survival occurred in 19/20 posterior tibial flaps (95%) and 15/20 sural flaps (75%) (risk difference, 20.0% points; 95% CI, -3.2 to 42.3; P = 0.182). Venous congestion occurred in 1/20 (5%) and 7/20 (35%), respectively (risk difference, -30.0% points; 95% CI, -52.1 to -4.9; P = 0.044). Operative time was shorter in the posterior tibial group (mean difference, -18.4 min; 95% CI, -26.3 to -10.5; P < 0.001). Functional findings were exploratory because standardized preoperative baselines were unavailable. Conclusions Anatomy-guided allocation introduced selection bias and limits direct comparison and causal inference. The findings support individualized, territory-based reconstruction rather than a hierarchy of superiority. The posterior tibial perforator-plus option may suit medial defects requiring limited-arc transfer, whereas the sural flap remains useful for posterolateral, lateral-malleolar, heel, and Achilles-region defects when its distal perforator territory and venous pathway are intact.

BMC Surgery
Shihezi University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College (CN)
Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.