Dual Illegibility, Ambiguous Loss, and Disenfranchised Grief: A Hybrid Model for Understanding AI Companion Bereavement

As emotionally responsive AI systems are increasingly used for companionship, clinicians are encountering forms of distress that do not fit established models of bereavement. When these systems are altered, restricted, or lost, some users experience reactions resembling attachment disruption and relational loss. Here, AI companions are conversational systems supporting ongoing relational bonds; we address grief for their disruption, not AI simulations of deceased people. This paper argues that AI companion bereavement is best understood as a technologically mediated hybrid loss at the intersection of ambiguous loss and disenfranchised grief. We introduce the concept of dual illegibility to describe uncertainty both about what has been lost and whether that loss is socially recognised as legitimate. Drawing on grief theories and emerging research on human-AI relationships, we outline a preliminary clinical response model and consider implications for practice, ethics, and research in an evolving landscape of technologically mediated attachment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228261483355
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual Illegibility, Ambiguous Loss, and Disenfranchised Grief: A Hybrid Model for Understanding AI Companion Bereavement

Olive K. L. Woo, Amy Jean Clark
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Dual Illegibility, Ambiguous Loss, and Disenfranchised Grief: A Hybrid Model for Understanding AI Companion Bereavement

Olive K. L. Woo, Amy Jean Clark
article en

Abstract

As emotionally responsive AI systems are increasingly used for companionship, clinicians are encountering forms of distress that do not fit established models of bereavement. When these systems are altered, restricted, or lost, some users experience reactions resembling attachment disruption and relational loss. Here, AI companions are conversational systems supporting ongoing relational bonds; we address grief for their disruption, not AI simulations of deceased people. This paper argues that AI companion bereavement is best understood as a technologically mediated hybrid loss at the intersection of ambiguous loss and disenfranchised grief. We introduce the concept of dual illegibility to describe uncertainty both about what has been lost and whether that loss is socially recognised as legitimate. Drawing on grief theories and emerging research on human-AI relationships, we outline a preliminary clinical response model and consider implications for practice, ethics, and research in an evolving landscape of technologically mediated attachment.

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Central Queensland University (AU), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.