The Clinical Anatomist: From Anatomical Competency to Professional Identity

Anatomy remains among the most resilient foundations of medicine, yet the professional who applies it most substantively to patient care has no defined professional identity, and the designation clinical anatomist is presently adopted by anyone who wishes to claim it. We argue that this absence is an opportunity rather than a deficiency. Drawing together two literatures that are rarely read side by side, professional identity formation and socialization in medical education and the sociology of professions concerned with expert jurisdiction, we first establish what a professional identity is and then distinguish it from competency: a competency is deployed, whereas an identity is embodied. That distinction resolves an apparent tension between a shared anatomical competency and a distinct subspecialty identity, a principle we term shared competency, asymmetric identity. It also separates three categories the field has understandably spoken of as one: the anatomist (a discipline), the anatomy educator (a role), and the clinical anatomist (an identity). We propose daily, practice-based collaboration directed at patient care as a working criterion for the identity, and the clinical anatomy fellowship as the apparatus through which the identity is formed and reproduced. The definition is offered as a starting point for debate and empirical testing rather than as a settled account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Anatomy
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70214
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Clinical Anatomist: From Anatomical Competency to Professional Identity

Nirusha Lachman, Marios Loukas
Clinical Anatomy
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

The Clinical Anatomist: From Anatomical Competency to Professional Identity

Nirusha Lachman, Marios Loukas
article en

Abstract

Anatomy remains among the most resilient foundations of medicine, yet the professional who applies it most substantively to patient care has no defined professional identity, and the designation clinical anatomist is presently adopted by anyone who wishes to claim it. We argue that this absence is an opportunity rather than a deficiency. Drawing together two literatures that are rarely read side by side, professional identity formation and socialization in medical education and the sociology of professions concerned with expert jurisdiction, we first establish what a professional identity is and then distinguish it from competency: a competency is deployed, whereas an identity is embodied. That distinction resolves an apparent tension between a shared anatomical competency and a distinct subspecialty identity, a principle we term shared competency, asymmetric identity. It also separates three categories the field has understandably spoken of as one: the anatomist (a discipline), the anatomy educator (a role), and the clinical anatomist (an identity). We propose daily, practice-based collaboration directed at patient care as a working criterion for the identity, and the clinical anatomy fellowship as the apparatus through which the identity is formed and reproduced. The definition is offered as a starting point for debate and empirical testing rather than as a settled account.

Clinical Anatomy
Mayo Clinic (US), St. George's University (GD), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.