The influence of cognitive tools on the quality of coach-teacher professional learning conversations

This study explores how literacy coaches use cognitive tools to foster productive professional learning conversations around teachers' videoed classroom text discussions. The use of cognitive tools increased the evidence-based specificity of these exchanges and was also associated with a greater likelihood that coaches and teachers connected specific instructional interactions in video-recorded lessons to dialogic goals and principles. Tool use, however, was not consistent. Specifically, coaches were more likely to use tools in planning reflection questions prior to the post-conference, rather than in ‘real time’ to support problematizing processes and interpretations of classroom discussions during the post-conference conversation. Even when tools were used, connections between specific evidence from class discussions to dialogic goals and principles rarely occurred. Implications are discussed for professional development that supports coaches in using cognitive tools more strategically and consistently to facilitate professional learning conversations that can advance teachers' adaptive expertise for dialogic teaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105813
Primary Topic
Coaching Methods and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of cognitive tools on the quality of coach-teacher professional learning conversations

Richard Correnti, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Dena Zook‐Howell, Tianwen Li
Teaching and Teacher Education
Coaching Methods and Impact
article

The influence of cognitive tools on the quality of coach-teacher professional learning conversations

Richard Correnti, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Dena Zook‐Howell, Tianwen Li
article en

Abstract

This study explores how literacy coaches use cognitive tools to foster productive professional learning conversations around teachers' videoed classroom text discussions. The use of cognitive tools increased the evidence-based specificity of these exchanges and was also associated with a greater likelihood that coaches and teachers connected specific instructional interactions in video-recorded lessons to dialogic goals and principles. Tool use, however, was not consistent. Specifically, coaches were more likely to use tools in planning reflection questions prior to the post-conference, rather than in ‘real time’ to support problematizing processes and interpretations of classroom discussions during the post-conference conversation. Even when tools were used, connections between specific evidence from class discussions to dialogic goals and principles rarely occurred. Implications are discussed for professional development that supports coaches in using cognitive tools more strategically and consistently to facilitate professional learning conversations that can advance teachers' adaptive expertise for dialogic teaching.

Teaching and Teacher EducationVol. 183
University of Pittsburgh (US)
James S. McDonnell Foundation, Institute of Education Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Coaching Methods and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.