The Global Immune–Nutrition–Inflammation Index (GINI) as a Candidate Prognostic Marker in Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cemiplimab

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a highly prevalent malignancy. While Cemiplimab has transformed the treatment landscape across various disease stages, reliable pretreatment biomarkers for risk stratification remain lacking.. The Global Immune–Nutrition–Inflammation Index (GINI) is a composite biomarker integrating systemic inflammation and nutritional status into a single score. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the pretreatment GINI in patients with cSCC receiving Cemiplimab across all treatment settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 73 patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cSCC treated with Cemiplimab between 2020 and 2023. Pretreatment laboratory parameters were extracted to calculate the GINI score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the optimal GINI cutoff to stratify patients into low- and high-GINI groups. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: An optimal GINI cutoff of 74.4 divided the cohort into low-GINI (38%) and high-GINI (62%) groups. In the multivariable Cox regression models, a high pretreatment GINI remained independently associated with both inferior OS (adjusted HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.05–6.01, p = 0.039) and inferior PFS (adjusted HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.45–7.14, p = 0.004). When compared against five established inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, LMR, PNI, and CAR), the GINI consistently demonstrated comparable prognostic performance across multiple statistical approaches. Conclusions: The pretreatment GINI is a candidate prognostic marker for patients with cSCC undergoing Cemiplimab therapy. Given its cost-effectiveness and ready availability from routine clinical laboratory workups, the GINI score may improve prognostic risk stratification and could potentially inform risk assessment and clinical monitoring in real-world oncological practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172862
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Global Immune–Nutrition–Inflammation Index (GINI) as a Candidate Prognostic Marker in Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cemiplimab

Ido Amir, Eyal Yosefof, Tara Coreanu, Itamar Averbuch et al.
Cancers
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

The Global Immune–Nutrition–Inflammation Index (GINI) as a Candidate Prognostic Marker in Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cemiplimab

Ido Amir, Eyal Yosefof, Tara Coreanu, Itamar Averbuch, Noga Kurman, Aviram Mizrachi, Amit Ritter, Dan Yaniv, Nofar Edri, Moran Amit
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a highly prevalent malignancy. While Cemiplimab has transformed the treatment landscape across various disease stages, reliable pretreatment biomarkers for risk stratification remain lacking.. The Global Immune–Nutrition–Inflammation Index (GINI) is a composite biomarker integrating systemic inflammation and nutritional status into a single score. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the pretreatment GINI in patients with cSCC receiving Cemiplimab across all treatment settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 73 patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cSCC treated with Cemiplimab between 2020 and 2023. Pretreatment laboratory parameters were extracted to calculate the GINI score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the optimal GINI cutoff to stratify patients into low- and high-GINI groups. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: An optimal GINI cutoff of 74.4 divided the cohort into low-GINI (38%) and high-GINI (62%) groups. In the multivariable Cox regression models, a high pretreatment GINI remained independently associated with both inferior OS (adjusted HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.05–6.01, p = 0.039) and inferior PFS (adjusted HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.45–7.14, p = 0.004). When compared against five established inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, LMR, PNI, and CAR), the GINI consistently demonstrated comparable prognostic performance across multiple statistical approaches. Conclusions: The pretreatment GINI is a candidate prognostic marker for patients with cSCC undergoing Cemiplimab therapy. Given its cost-effectiveness and ready availability from routine clinical laboratory workups, the GINI score may improve prognostic risk stratification and could potentially inform risk assessment and clinical monitoring in real-world oncological practice.

CancersVol. 18(17)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Cornell University (US), Rabin Medical Center (IL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.