Adolescents’ interpretations of romantic chatbots, relational control, and AI-enabled harm

This exploratory qualitative study examines how adolescents interpret AI-mediated intimate practices that may not yet be widespread among minors but are already salient within their digital imaginaries, focusing on romantic chatbots, AI-assisted relational advice, and AI-enabled practices of control and harm. Six online, gender-segregated focus groups were conducted with 33 adolescents aged 16–18 in Spain. Participants framed romantic chatbots as sites of idealized, conflict-free intimacy shaped by user control; evaluations of AI-based relational advice were ambivalent, particularly among girls, who questioned its personalization and intent. Adolescents condemned highly intrusive practices such as message cloning, yet often normalized other forms of monitoring (e.g. real-time location sharing) as safety or care. Deepfakes were consistently identified as the most harmful practice, with participants highlighting violations of consent and noting gendered dynamics in peer-group circulation. Overall, marked AI appears less as a source of novel inequalities than as an amplifier of existing affective and gendered scripts in adolescent digital cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Reports in Communication
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2026.2726278
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adolescents’ interpretations of romantic chatbots, relational control, and AI-enabled harm

María Antonia Paz Rebollo, Beatriz Feijóo
Qualitative Research Reports in Communication
AI in Service Interactions
article

Adolescents’ interpretations of romantic chatbots, relational control, and AI-enabled harm

María Antonia Paz Rebollo, Beatriz Feijóo
article en

Abstract

This exploratory qualitative study examines how adolescents interpret AI-mediated intimate practices that may not yet be widespread among minors but are already salient within their digital imaginaries, focusing on romantic chatbots, AI-assisted relational advice, and AI-enabled practices of control and harm. Six online, gender-segregated focus groups were conducted with 33 adolescents aged 16–18 in Spain. Participants framed romantic chatbots as sites of idealized, conflict-free intimacy shaped by user control; evaluations of AI-based relational advice were ambivalent, particularly among girls, who questioned its personalization and intent. Adolescents condemned highly intrusive practices such as message cloning, yet often normalized other forms of monitoring (e.g. real-time location sharing) as safety or care. Deepfakes were consistently identified as the most harmful practice, with participants highlighting violations of consent and noting gendered dynamics in peer-group circulation. Overall, marked AI appears less as a source of novel inequalities than as an amplifier of existing affective and gendered scripts in adolescent digital cultures.

Qualitative Research Reports in Communication
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.