Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy for selected appendiceal neoplasms: Early experience from a national referral centre

Abstract Background: Selected high-risk appendiceal neoplasms with tumour perforation or T4 disease may be considered for risk-reducing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), even without overt radiological peritoneal disease. Since 2012, our centre has offered laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC, and a robotic approach was recently introduced to enhance visualisation, dexterity, and precision while minimising surgical trauma. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of risk-reducing robotic CRS-HIPEC (RCRS-HIPEC) in selected patients with high-risk appendiceal neoplasms without radiological peritoneal disease. Patients and Methods: This retrospective single-centre case series was conducted at a national referral centre for peritoneal surface malignancy. Eight patients underwent standardised RCRS-HIPEC. The cohort included low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm ( n = 3), goblet cell carcinoma ( n = 4), and appendiceal adenocarcinoma ( n = 1). The standardised operative approach included omentectomy, falciform excision, umbilicectomy, and cholecystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy where indicated, followed by closed HIPEC. Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, complications, length of stay, histopathology, patient-reported recovery, and preliminary resource utilisation. Results: Mean age was 65.8 years; there were 5 male and 3 female patients. Mean operative time was 6 h 19 min (±25 min), with minimal blood loss (<150 mL). No patient required epidural analgesia, parenteral nutrition, or prolonged critical care. Median time to first flatus was 3 days, and median hospital stay was 5 days. Two patients experienced Clavien–Dindo grade I morbidity, with no major complications. Histopathology demonstrated residual disease in two patients. Early electronic patient-reported outcome measures suggested favourable recovery, and preliminary Patient Level Information and Costing System data indicated potential NHS resource savings. Conclusions: RCRS-HIPEC is feasible and safe in carefully selected patients with high-risk appendiceal neoplasms without radiological peritoneal disease. A standardised robotic approach may promote reproducibility, support enhanced recovery, and reduce healthcare resource use. Larger comparative studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published
2026-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_528_25
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy for selected appendiceal neoplasms: Early experience from a national referral centre

Chelliah Selvasekar, Lorena Martín-Román, Prateek Arora, F. Liccardo et al.
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy for selected appendiceal neoplasms: Early experience from a national referral centre

Chelliah Selvasekar, Lorena Martín-Román, Prateek Arora, F. Liccardo, Paul Sutton, Rebecca Fish, Omer Aziz, Jonathan Wild, Hamish Clouston, Malinga Gallala, Malcolm Wilson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Selected high-risk appendiceal neoplasms with tumour perforation or T4 disease may be considered for risk-reducing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), even without overt radiological peritoneal disease. Since 2012, our centre has offered laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC, and a robotic approach was recently introduced to enhance visualisation, dexterity, and precision while minimising surgical trauma. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of risk-reducing robotic CRS-HIPEC (RCRS-HIPEC) in selected patients with high-risk appendiceal neoplasms without radiological peritoneal disease. Patients and Methods: This retrospective single-centre case series was conducted at a national referral centre for peritoneal surface malignancy. Eight patients underwent standardised RCRS-HIPEC. The cohort included low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm ( n = 3), goblet cell carcinoma ( n = 4), and appendiceal adenocarcinoma ( n = 1). The standardised operative approach included omentectomy, falciform excision, umbilicectomy, and cholecystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy where indicated, followed by closed HIPEC. Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, complications, length of stay, histopathology, patient-reported recovery, and preliminary resource utilisation. Results: Mean age was 65.8 years; there were 5 male and 3 female patients. Mean operative time was 6 h 19 min (±25 min), with minimal blood loss (<150 mL). No patient required epidural analgesia, parenteral nutrition, or prolonged critical care. Median time to first flatus was 3 days, and median hospital stay was 5 days. Two patients experienced Clavien–Dindo grade I morbidity, with no major complications. Histopathology demonstrated residual disease in two patients. Early electronic patient-reported outcome measures suggested favourable recovery, and preliminary Patient Level Information and Costing System data indicated potential NHS resource savings. Conclusions: RCRS-HIPEC is feasible and safe in carefully selected patients with high-risk appendiceal neoplasms without radiological peritoneal disease. A standardised robotic approach may promote reproducibility, support enhanced recovery, and reduce healthcare resource use. Larger comparative studies are warranted.

Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.