A risk science perspective on inductive risk

Abstract The concept of inductive risk—commonly understood as the possibility of error in accepting or rejecting a scientific hypothesis—has been a topic of discussion in the philosophy of science since the 1950s. The primary focus has been on its implications for the legitimacy of non-epistemic values in science, particularly their role in weighing risks of false positives against false negatives. This paper examines inductive risk through the lens of contemporary risk science. Drawing on recent developments in the conceptualization of risk, it offers new insights into how inductive risk can be assessed and characterized. The analysis is illustrated with the example of testing a new drug. The paper identifies and discusses several strategies for mitigating inductive risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05759-8
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A risk science perspective on inductive risk

Malvina Ongaro, Terje Aven
Synthese
Risk Perception and Management
article

A risk science perspective on inductive risk

Malvina Ongaro, Terje Aven
article en

Abstract

Abstract The concept of inductive risk—commonly understood as the possibility of error in accepting or rejecting a scientific hypothesis—has been a topic of discussion in the philosophy of science since the 1950s. The primary focus has been on its implications for the legitimacy of non-epistemic values in science, particularly their role in weighing risks of false positives against false negatives. This paper examines inductive risk through the lens of contemporary risk science. Drawing on recent developments in the conceptualization of risk, it offers new insights into how inductive risk can be assessed and characterized. The analysis is illustrated with the example of testing a new drug. The paper identifies and discusses several strategies for mitigating inductive risk.

SyntheseVol. 208(3)
University of Stavanger (NO), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Fondazione Cariplo, Politecnico di Milano
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.